PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HIMDX vs. HJPSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HIMDX vs. HJPSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hennessy Cornerstone Mid Cap 30 Fund Institutional Class (HIMDX) and Hennessy Japan Small Cap Fund (HJPSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HIMDX achieves a 18.75% return, which is significantly higher than HJPSX's 15.25% return. Over the past 10 years, HIMDX has outperformed HJPSX with an annualized return of 15.30%, while HJPSX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.18% annualized return.


HIMDX

1D
0.59%
1M
5.03%
YTD
18.75%
6M
16.50%
1Y
27.00%
3Y*
24.66%
5Y*
17.63%
10Y*
15.30%

HJPSX

1D
0.36%
1M
0.76%
YTD
15.25%
6M
15.28%
1Y
33.17%
3Y*
20.96%
5Y*
8.90%
10Y*
11.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HIMDX vs. HJPSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HIMDX
Hennessy Cornerstone Mid Cap 30 Fund Institutional Class
18.75%3.04%34.59%31.31%3.10%27.77%23.82%16.02%-23.18%21.17%
HJPSX
Hennessy Japan Small Cap Fund
15.25%29.02%8.24%16.30%-16.35%-4.64%13.43%19.97%-12.56%49.60%

Correlation

The correlation between HIMDX and HJPSX is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2009

0.40

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HIMDX vs. HJPSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HIMDX
HIMDX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
HIMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
HIMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

HJPSX
HJPSX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
HJPSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HJPSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
HJPSX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
HJPSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
HJPSX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HIMDX vs. HJPSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hennessy Cornerstone Mid Cap 30 Fund Institutional Class (HIMDX) and Hennessy Japan Small Cap Fund (HJPSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HIMDXHJPSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.35

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.22

2.31

-0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.42

7.00

+0.43

HIMDX vs. HJPSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HIMDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is lower than the HJPSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HIMDX and HJPSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HIMDX vs. HJPSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIMDX drawdown since its inception was -55.79%, which is greater than HJPSX's maximum drawdown of -47.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIMDX and HJPSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HIMDXHJPSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.79%

-47.91%

-7.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.62%

-14.77%

+2.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.65%

-14.77%

-12.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.65%

-33.24%

+5.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.79%

-34.80%

-20.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.69%

-2.52%

+1.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.15%

-10.04%

+2.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.77%

4.86%

-1.09%

Volatility

HIMDX vs. HJPSX - Volatility Comparison

Hennessy Cornerstone Mid Cap 30 Fund Institutional Class (HIMDX) has a higher volatility of 7.33% compared to Hennessy Japan Small Cap Fund (HJPSX) at 4.42%. This indicates that HIMDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HJPSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HIMDXHJPSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.33%

4.42%

+2.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.50%

13.28%

+3.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.07%

17.46%

+4.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.41%

17.28%

+6.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.14%

17.72%

+7.42%

HIMDX vs. HJPSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HIMDX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than HJPSX's 1.57% expense ratio.


Dividends

HIMDX vs. HJPSX - Dividend Comparison

HIMDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than HJPSX's 11.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HIMDX
Hennessy Cornerstone Mid Cap 30 Fund Institutional Class
0.88%1.05%19.21%9.61%21.65%1.71%0.00%0.00%40.44%18.62%0.64%1.10%
HJPSX
Hennessy Japan Small Cap Fund
11.49%13.25%3.64%0.85%0.61%0.43%0.23%1.30%3.46%2.09%2.03%3.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


HIMDX and HJPSX have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HIMDX has higher volatility (7.33%) compared to HJPSX (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HIMDX dropped -55.79% vs HJPSX's -47.91%.

HJPSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HIMDX and HJPSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer