PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HIMDX vs. HJPNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HIMDX vs. HJPNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hennessy Cornerstone Mid Cap 30 Fund Institutional Class (HIMDX) and Hennessy Japan Fund (HJPNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HIMDX achieves a 17.26% return, which is significantly lower than HJPNX's 19.03% return. Over the past 10 years, HIMDX has outperformed HJPNX with an annualized return of 14.68%, while HJPNX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.67% annualized return.


HIMDX

1D
-0.18%
1M
3.15%
YTD
17.26%
6M
17.76%
1Y
28.09%
3Y*
24.74%
5Y*
16.60%
10Y*
14.68%

HJPNX

1D
-0.53%
1M
9.74%
YTD
19.03%
6M
21.33%
1Y
31.16%
3Y*
20.27%
5Y*
7.60%
10Y*
9.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HIMDX vs. HJPNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HIMDX
Hennessy Cornerstone Mid Cap 30 Fund Institutional Class
17.26%3.04%34.59%31.31%3.10%27.77%23.82%16.02%-23.18%21.17%
HJPNX
Hennessy Japan Fund
19.03%14.58%18.72%22.90%-30.65%-3.08%25.52%18.04%-6.57%32.04%

Correlation

The correlation between HIMDX and HJPNX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2009

0.49

The correlation between HIMDX and HJPNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HIMDX vs. HJPNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HIMDX
HIMDX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
HIMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
HIMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

HJPNX
HJPNX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
HJPNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HJPNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
HJPNX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
HJPNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
HJPNX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HIMDX vs. HJPNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hennessy Cornerstone Mid Cap 30 Fund Institutional Class (HIMDX) and Hennessy Japan Fund (HJPNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HIMDXHJPNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.24

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.36

2.10

+0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.96

7.06

+0.90

HIMDX vs. HJPNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HIMDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is comparable to the HJPNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HIMDX and HJPNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HIMDXHJPNXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.39

1.32

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.36

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

0.52

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.45

+0.21

Drawdowns

HIMDX vs. HJPNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIMDX drawdown since its inception was -55.79%, smaller than the maximum HJPNX drawdown of -59.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIMDX and HJPNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HIMDXHJPNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.79%

-59.65%

+3.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.62%

-14.18%

+1.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.65%

-20.06%

-7.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.65%

-44.72%

+17.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.79%

-44.72%

-11.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.76%

-0.53%

-1.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.17%

-15.57%

+8.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.73%

4.22%

-0.49%

Volatility

HIMDX vs. HJPNX - Volatility Comparison

Hennessy Cornerstone Mid Cap 30 Fund Institutional Class (HIMDX) has a higher volatility of 6.32% compared to Hennessy Japan Fund (HJPNX) at 4.23%. This indicates that HIMDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HJPNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HIMDXHJPNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.32%

4.23%

+2.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.81%

16.67%

-0.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.47%

22.67%

-1.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.35%

21.00%

+2.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.08%

18.80%

+6.28%

HIMDX vs. HJPNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HIMDX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than HJPNX's 1.44% expense ratio.


Dividends

HIMDX vs. HJPNX - Dividend Comparison

HIMDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, less than HJPNX's 10.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HIMDX
Hennessy Cornerstone Mid Cap 30 Fund Institutional Class
0.89%1.05%19.21%9.61%21.65%1.71%0.00%0.00%40.44%18.62%0.64%1.10%
HJPNX
Hennessy Japan Fund
10.78%12.83%5.80%5.87%0.00%0.89%0.00%0.13%0.04%0.02%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HIMDX and HJPNX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HIMDX has higher volatility (6.32%) compared to HJPNX (4.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HIMDX dropped -55.79% vs HJPNX's -59.65%.

HIMDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HIMDX and HJPNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer