PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HILYX vs. HFLYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HILYX vs. HFLYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford International Value Fund (HILYX) and Hartford Floating Rate Fund (HFLYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HILYX achieves a 11.28% return, which is significantly higher than HFLYX's 1.11% return. Over the past 10 years, HILYX has outperformed HFLYX with an annualized return of 11.29%, while HFLYX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.30% annualized return.


HILYX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.00%
YTD
11.28%
6M
12.00%
1Y
31.35%
3Y*
20.22%
5Y*
13.93%
10Y*
11.29%

HFLYX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.51%
YTD
1.11%
6M
1.83%
1Y
4.35%
3Y*
5.79%
5Y*
3.95%
10Y*
4.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HILYX vs. HFLYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HILYX
Hartford International Value Fund
11.28%44.76%0.28%19.84%-2.28%18.79%-5.94%18.28%-17.74%24.91%
HFLYX
Hartford Floating Rate Fund
1.11%4.79%6.50%9.79%-3.40%4.02%1.32%8.56%-0.62%4.94%

Correlation

The correlation between HILYX and HFLYX is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2010

0.28

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HILYX vs. HFLYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HILYX
HILYX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
HILYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HILYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
HILYX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
HILYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
HILYX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

HFLYX
HFLYX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
HFLYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HFLYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
HFLYX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
HFLYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
HFLYX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HILYX vs. HFLYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford International Value Fund (HILYX) and Hartford Floating Rate Fund (HFLYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HILYXHFLYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.46

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.71

2.31

+0.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.53

7.12

+3.41

HILYX vs. HFLYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HILYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is higher than the HFLYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HILYX and HFLYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HILYX vs. HFLYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HILYX drawdown since its inception was -48.29%, which is greater than HFLYX's maximum drawdown of -33.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HILYX and HFLYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HILYXHFLYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.29%

-33.12%

-15.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.31%

-1.95%

-9.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.04%

-3.42%

-10.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.58%

-7.48%

-18.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.29%

-22.42%

-25.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.43%

-0.27%

-1.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.15%

-2.06%

-6.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.91%

0.63%

+2.28%

Volatility

HILYX vs. HFLYX - Volatility Comparison

Hartford International Value Fund (HILYX) has a higher volatility of 3.99% compared to Hartford Floating Rate Fund (HFLYX) at 0.73%. This indicates that HILYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HFLYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HILYXHFLYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.99%

0.73%

+3.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.40%

2.08%

+9.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.01%

2.75%

+11.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.19%

2.99%

+12.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.04%

4.09%

+12.95%

HILYX vs. HFLYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HILYX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than HFLYX's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

HILYX vs. HFLYX - Dividend Comparison

HILYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.21%, less than HFLYX's 7.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HFLYX
Hartford Floating Rate Fund
7.71%7.23%6.68%7.20%5.18%3.22%3.68%4.68%6.17%4.23%4.34%4.72%
HILYX
Hartford International Value Fund
5.21%5.80%0.00%2.67%2.84%3.22%2.08%3.05%8.24%6.97%5.23%3.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


HILYX and HFLYX have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HILYX has higher volatility (3.99%) compared to HFLYX (0.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HILYX dropped -48.29% vs HFLYX's -33.12%.

HILYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HILYX and HFLYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer