PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HILYX vs. HFQAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HILYX vs. HFQAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford International Value Fund (HILYX) and Janus Henderson Global Equity Income Fund (HFQAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with HILYX having a 18.21% return and HFQAX slightly lower at 17.80%. Over the past 10 years, HILYX has outperformed HFQAX with an annualized return of 11.62%, while HFQAX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.90% annualized return.


HILYX

1D
2.16%
1M
6.00%
6M
11.35%
YTD
18.21%
1Y
34.81%
3Y*
20.94%
5Y*
15.43%
10Y*
11.62%
ALL TIME*
10.77%

HFQAX

1D
1.72%
1M
3.62%
6M
10.24%
YTD
17.80%
1Y
30.15%
3Y*
18.64%
5Y*
11.82%
10Y*
8.90%
ALL TIME*
5.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

HILYX vs. HFQAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HILYX
Hartford International Value Fund
18.21%44.76%0.28%19.84%-2.28%18.79%-5.94%18.28%-17.74%24.91%
HFQAX
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income Fund
17.80%29.61%6.86%10.17%-6.59%12.45%1.66%20.87%-15.86%19.14%

Correlation

The correlation between HILYX and HFQAX is 0.88, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2010

0.87

The correlation between HILYX and HFQAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HILYX vs. HFQAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HILYX
HILYX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
HILYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HILYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
HILYX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
HILYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
HILYX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

HFQAX
HFQAX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
HFQAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HFQAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
HFQAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
HFQAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
HFQAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HILYX vs. HFQAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford International Value Fund (HILYX) and Janus Henderson Global Equity Income Fund (HFQAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HILYXHFQAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.44

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.01

2.81

+0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.64

10.08

+1.56

HILYX vs. HFQAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HILYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is comparable to the HFQAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HILYX and HFQAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HILYX vs. HFQAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HILYX drawdown since its inception was -48.29%, smaller than the maximum HFQAX drawdown of -52.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HILYX and HFQAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HILYXHFQAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.29%

-52.77%

+4.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.31%

-9.99%

-1.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.04%

-12.20%

-1.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.58%

-21.83%

-3.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.29%

-34.79%

-13.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.10%

-10.79%

+2.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.92%

2.78%

+0.14%

Volatility

HILYX vs. HFQAX - Volatility Comparison

Hartford International Value Fund (HILYX) has a higher volatility of 4.05% compared to Janus Henderson Global Equity Income Fund (HFQAX) at 3.78%. This indicates that HILYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HFQAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HILYXHFQAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.05%

3.78%

+0.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.78%

10.34%

+1.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.06%

12.09%

+1.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.15%

13.07%

+2.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.78%

14.44%

+2.34%

HILYX vs. HFQAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HILYX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is lower than HFQAX's 1.24% expense ratio.


Dividends

HILYX vs. HFQAX - Dividend Comparison

HILYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.91%, less than HFQAX's 5.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HFQAX
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income Fund
5.79%6.59%7.96%7.89%8.02%6.92%7.25%6.80%7.66%6.03%6.77%6.60%
HILYX
Hartford International Value Fund
4.91%5.80%0.00%2.67%2.84%3.22%2.08%3.05%8.24%6.97%5.23%3.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


HILYX and HFQAX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HILYX has higher volatility (4.05%) compared to HFQAX (3.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HILYX dropped -48.29% vs HFQAX's -52.77%.

HILYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HILYX and HFQAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer