PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HILYX vs. HFQAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HILYX vs. HFQAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford International Value Fund (HILYX) and Janus Henderson Global Equity Income Fund (HFQAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with HILYX having a 11.44% return and HFQAX slightly higher at 11.69%. Over the past 10 years, HILYX has outperformed HFQAX with an annualized return of 11.17%, while HFQAX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.36% annualized return.


HILYX

1D
-0.18%
1M
2.63%
YTD
11.44%
6M
14.60%
1Y
30.43%
3Y*
21.37%
5Y*
12.91%
10Y*
11.17%

HFQAX

1D
0.25%
1M
1.77%
YTD
11.69%
6M
14.77%
1Y
25.59%
3Y*
17.99%
5Y*
10.12%
10Y*
8.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HILYX vs. HFQAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HILYX
Hartford International Value Fund
11.44%44.76%0.28%19.84%-2.28%18.79%-5.94%18.28%-17.74%24.91%
HFQAX
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income Fund
11.69%29.61%6.86%10.17%-6.59%12.45%1.66%20.87%-15.86%19.14%

Correlation

The correlation between HILYX and HFQAX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2010

0.87

The correlation between HILYX and HFQAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HILYX vs. HFQAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HILYX
HILYX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
HILYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HILYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
HILYX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
HILYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
HILYX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

HFQAX
HFQAX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
HFQAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HFQAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
HFQAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
HFQAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
HFQAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HILYX vs. HFQAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford International Value Fund (HILYX) and Janus Henderson Global Equity Income Fund (HFQAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HILYXHFQAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.32

2.37

-0.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.21

3.20

+0.01

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.44

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.83

2.67

+0.16

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.06

9.61

+1.45

HILYX vs. HFQAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HILYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is comparable to the HFQAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HILYX and HFQAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HILYXHFQAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.32

2.37

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

0.78

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

0.57

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.32

+0.28

Drawdowns

HILYX vs. HFQAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HILYX drawdown since its inception was -48.29%, smaller than the maximum HFQAX drawdown of -52.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HILYX and HFQAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HILYXHFQAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.29%

-52.77%

+4.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.31%

-9.99%

-1.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.04%

-12.20%

-1.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.58%

-21.83%

-3.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.29%

-34.79%

-13.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.79%

-2.02%

+1.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.17%

-10.87%

+2.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.90%

2.78%

+0.12%

Volatility

HILYX vs. HFQAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hartford International Value Fund (HILYX) is 3.71%, while Janus Henderson Global Equity Income Fund (HFQAX) has a volatility of 4.54%. This indicates that HILYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HFQAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HILYXHFQAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.71%

4.54%

-0.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.98%

9.37%

+1.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.81%

11.34%

+2.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.17%

13.04%

+2.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.07%

14.75%

+2.32%

HILYX vs. HFQAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HILYX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is lower than HFQAX's 1.24% expense ratio.


Dividends

HILYX vs. HFQAX - Dividend Comparison

HILYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.20%, less than HFQAX's 5.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HFQAX
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income Fund
5.97%6.59%7.96%7.89%8.02%6.92%7.25%6.80%7.66%6.03%6.77%6.60%
HILYX
Hartford International Value Fund
5.20%5.80%0.00%2.67%2.84%3.22%2.08%3.05%8.24%6.97%5.23%3.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


HILYX and HFQAX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HFQAX has higher volatility (4.54%) compared to HILYX (3.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HILYX dropped -48.29% vs HFQAX's -52.77%.

HFQAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HILYX and HFQAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer