HFLYX vs. EIFAX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

HFLYX (Hartford Floating Rate Fund) and EIFAX (Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund) are both Bank Loan funds. Over the past 10 years, HFLYX returned 4.30%/yr vs 5.06%/yr for EIFAX. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HFLYX charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for EIFAX.

Performance

HFLYX vs. EIFAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Floating Rate Fund (HFLYX) and Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund (EIFAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HFLYX achieves a 1.11% return, which is significantly higher than EIFAX's 0.48% return. Over the past 10 years, HFLYX has underperformed EIFAX with an annualized return of 4.30%, while EIFAX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.06% annualized return.

HFLYX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.51%
• YTD: 1.11%
• 6M: 1.83%
• 1Y: 4.35%
• 3Y*: 5.79%
• 5Y*: 3.95%
• 10Y*: 4.30%

EIFAX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.37%
• YTD: 0.48%
• 6M: 0.96%
• 1Y: 3.60%
• 3Y*: 6.83%
• 5Y*: 4.89%
• 10Y*: 5.06%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HFLYX vs. EIFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HFLYX Hartford Floating Rate Fund	1.11%	4.79%	6.50%	9.79%	-3.40%	4.02%	1.32%	8.56%	-0.62%	4.94%
EIFAX Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund	0.48%	4.54%	8.91%	11.86%	-2.98%	5.41%	1.90%	9.02%	0.28%	5.16%

Correlation

The correlation between HFLYX and EIFAX is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.64
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.58
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.70
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2008	0.71

The correlation between HFLYX and EIFAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (3 years) to 0.71 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

HFLYX vs. EIFAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HFLYX

HFLYX Risk / Return Rank: 53
HFLYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
HFLYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
HFLYX Omega Ratio Rank: 78
HFLYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
HFLYX Martin Ratio Rank: 34

EIFAX

EIFAX Risk / Return Rank: 40
EIFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
EIFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
EIFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 70
EIFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
EIFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HFLYX vs. EIFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Floating Rate Fund (HFLYX) and Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund (EIFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HFLYX	EIFAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.64	1.40	+0.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.43	2.96	+0.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.42	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.31	1.58	+0.73
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.12	4.76	+2.37

HFLYX vs. EIFAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HFLYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the EIFAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HFLYX and EIFAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HFLYX vs. EIFAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HFLYX drawdown since its inception was -33.12%, smaller than the maximum EIFAX drawdown of -40.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFLYX and EIFAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	HFLYX	EIFAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.12%	-40.28%	+7.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.95%	-2.29%	+0.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.42%	-3.43%	+0.01%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-7.48%	-7.63%	+0.15%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-22.42%	-24.22%	+1.80%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.27%	-0.21%	-0.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.06%	-2.26%	+0.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.63%	0.76%	-0.13%

Volatility

HFLYX vs. EIFAX - Volatility Comparison

Hartford Floating Rate Fund (HFLYX) has a higher volatility of 0.73% compared to Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund (EIFAX) at 0.68%. This indicates that HFLYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EIFAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HFLYX	EIFAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.73%	0.68%	+0.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.08%	1.98%	+0.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.75%	2.58%	+0.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.99%	3.15%	-0.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.09%	4.45%	-0.36%

HFLYX vs. EIFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HFLYX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than EIFAX's 0.47% expense ratio.

Dividends

HFLYX vs. EIFAX - Dividend Comparison

HFLYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.71%, more than EIFAX's 7.63% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EIFAX Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund	7.63%	8.09%	8.91%	7.02%	5.92%	4.03%	4.51%	5.58%	5.10%	4.46%	5.02%	5.29%
HFLYX Hartford Floating Rate Fund	7.71%	7.23%	6.68%	7.20%	5.18%	3.22%	3.68%	4.68%	6.17%	4.23%	4.34%	4.72%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HFLYX and EIFAX in my portfolio?

HFLYX and EIFAX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HFLYX or EIFAX?

HFLYX has higher volatility (0.73%) compared to EIFAX (0.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HFLYX dropped -33.12% vs EIFAX's -40.28%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HFLYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.