PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HIK.L vs. SNN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

HIK.L vs. SNN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Hikma Pharmaceuticals plc (HIK.L) and Smith & Nephew plc (SNN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HIK.L is traded in GBp, while SNN is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SNN values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HIK.L achieves a -3.15% return, which is significantly higher than SNN's -4.34% return. Over the past 10 years, HIK.L has underperformed SNN with an annualized return of -2.28%, while SNN has yielded a comparatively higher 1.98% annualized return.


HIK.L

1D
3.11%
1M
3.47%
YTD
-3.15%
6M
-5.58%
1Y
-27.44%
3Y*
-3.58%
5Y*
-6.83%
10Y*
-2.28%

SNN

1D
-0.15%
1M
3.08%
YTD
-4.34%
6M
-7.25%
1Y
5.21%
3Y*
0.64%
5Y*
-2.66%
10Y*
1.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HIK.L vs. SNN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HIK.L
Hikma Pharmaceuticals plc
-3.15%-19.62%14.90%18.37%-28.40%-10.43%28.87%18.12%54.10%-39.17%
SNN
Smith & Nephew plc
-4.34%27.07%-5.72%-0.78%-10.71%-15.42%-13.03%25.87%15.35%8.32%

Correlation

The correlation between HIK.L and SNN is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 4, 2007

0.25

The correlation between HIK.L and SNN shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (3 years) to 0.26 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

HIK.L:

£3.26B

SNN:

$13.36B

EPS

HIK.L:

£3.41

SNN:

$2.37

PE Ratio

HIK.L:

4.28

SNN:

12.92

PEG Ratio

HIK.L:

0.33

SNN:

0.45

PS Ratio

HIK.L:

0.50

SNN:

1.12

PB Ratio

HIK.L:

1.26

SNN:

2.53

Total Revenue (TTM)

HIK.L:

£6.48B

SNN:

$11.99B

Gross Profit (TTM)

HIK.L:

£2.80B

SNN:

$8.25B

EBITDA (TTM)

HIK.L:

£1.46B

SNN:

$2.82B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HIK.L vs. SNN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HIK.L
HIK.L Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
HIK.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIK.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIK.L Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
HIK.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIK.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

SNN
SNN Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
SNN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNN Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
SNN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNN Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HIK.L vs. SNN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hikma Pharmaceuticals plc (HIK.L) and Smith & Nephew plc (SNN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HIK.LSNNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.85

1.07

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.63

0.22

-0.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.10

0.48

-1.58

HIK.L vs. SNN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HIK.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.83, which is lower than the SNN Sharpe Ratio of 0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HIK.L and SNN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HIK.LSNNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.83

0.18

-1.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.25

-0.11

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.07

0.08

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.21

+0.11

Drawdowns

HIK.L vs. SNN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIK.L drawdown since its inception was -67.40%, which is greater than SNN's maximum drawdown of -51.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIK.L and SNN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HIK.LSNNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.40%

-51.13%

-16.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.67%

-23.64%

-20.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-47.40%

-29.18%

-18.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-54.46%

-40.79%

-13.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-67.40%

-51.13%

-16.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-37.14%

-32.47%

-4.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.55%

-16.99%

-2.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.02%

10.89%

+14.13%

Volatility

HIK.L vs. SNN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hikma Pharmaceuticals plc (HIK.L) is 6.63%, while Smith & Nephew plc (SNN) has a volatility of 7.17%. This indicates that HIK.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SNN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HIK.LSNNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.63%

7.17%

-0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.21%

17.60%

+8.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.98%

29.11%

+3.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.78%

25.39%

+2.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.64%

25.62%

+6.02%

Dividends

HIK.L vs. SNN - Dividend Comparison

HIK.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.25%, more than SNN's 2.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HIK.L
Hikma Pharmaceuticals plc
4.25%4.13%3.08%2.76%2.71%1.70%1.44%1.71%1.48%2.19%1.21%0.89%
SNN
Smith & Nephew plc
2.55%2.32%3.05%2.75%2.79%2.17%1.78%1.51%1.96%1.76%2.08%1.68%

Financials

HIK.L vs. SNN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hikma Pharmaceuticals plc and Smith & Nephew plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B20212022202320242025
1.70B
3.19B
(HIK.L) Total Revenue
(SNN) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. HIK.L values in GBp, SNN values in USD

HIK.L vs. SNN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Hikma Pharmaceuticals plc and Smith & Nephew plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20212022202320242025
39.6%
65.6%
Portfolio components
HIK.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hikma Pharmaceuticals plc reported a gross profit of 673.22M and revenue of 1.70B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.6%.

SNN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Smith & Nephew plc reported a gross profit of 2.09B and revenue of 3.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 65.6%.

HIK.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hikma Pharmaceuticals plc reported an operating income of 305.46M and revenue of 1.70B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.0%.

SNN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Smith & Nephew plc reported an operating income of 570.45M and revenue of 3.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.9%.

HIK.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hikma Pharmaceuticals plc reported a net income of 164.79M and revenue of 1.70B, resulting in a net margin of 9.7%.

SNN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Smith & Nephew plc reported a net income of 330.82M and revenue of 3.19B, resulting in a net margin of 10.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


HIK.L and SNN have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HIK.L and SNN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer