PortfoliosLab logo
SNN vs. TCEHY
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between SNN and TCEHY is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

SNN vs. TCEHY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Smith & Nephew plc (SNN) and Tencent Holdings Limited (TCEHY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%1,000.00%2,000.00%3,000.00%4,000.00%5,000.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
121.41%
4,895.26%
SNN
TCEHY

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

SNN:

0.58

TCEHY:

1.01

Sortino Ratio

SNN:

0.95

TCEHY:

1.57

Omega Ratio

SNN:

1.15

TCEHY:

1.22

Calmar Ratio

SNN:

0.35

TCEHY:

0.74

Martin Ratio

SNN:

1.34

TCEHY:

3.44

Ulcer Index

SNN:

12.40%

TCEHY:

10.61%

Daily Std Dev

SNN:

27.76%

TCEHY:

35.03%

Max Drawdown

SNN:

-55.20%

TCEHY:

-73.21%

Current Drawdown

SNN:

-36.71%

TCEHY:

-29.05%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SNN:

$12.57B

TCEHY:

$579.52B

EPS

SNN:

$0.94

TCEHY:

$2.82

PE Ratio

SNN:

30.45

TCEHY:

22.57

PEG Ratio

SNN:

0.95

TCEHY:

1.65

PS Ratio

SNN:

2.16

TCEHY:

0.88

PB Ratio

SNN:

2.38

TCEHY:

4.35

Total Revenue (TTM)

SNN:

$5.81B

TCEHY:

$500.76B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SNN:

$4.05B

TCEHY:

$265.43B

EBITDA (TTM)

SNN:

$1.24B

TCEHY:

$171.80B

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SNN having a 17.20% return and TCEHY slightly higher at 17.88%. Over the past 10 years, SNN has underperformed TCEHY with an annualized return of 0.08%, while TCEHY has yielded a comparatively higher 13.46% annualized return.


SNN

YTD

17.20%

1M

9.63%

6M

18.60%

1Y

16.07%

5Y*

-4.54%

10Y*

0.08%

TCEHY

YTD

17.88%

1M

11.24%

6M

16.92%

1Y

34.89%

5Y*

5.47%

10Y*

13.46%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

SNN vs. TCEHY — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SNN is 6868
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SNN is 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SNN is 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SNN is 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SNN is 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SNN is 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

TCEHY
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of TCEHY is 8080
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of TCEHY is 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of TCEHY is 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of TCEHY is 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of TCEHY is 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of TCEHY is 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

SNN vs. TCEHY - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Smith & Nephew plc (SNN) and Tencent Holdings Limited (TCEHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current SNN Sharpe Ratio is 0.58, which is lower than the TCEHY Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNN and TCEHY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.58
1.01
SNN
TCEHY

Dividends

SNN vs. TCEHY - Dividend Comparison

SNN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%, more than TCEHY's 0.69% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
SNN
Smith & Nephew plc
2.65%3.05%2.75%2.79%2.17%1.78%1.51%1.96%1.76%2.08%1.71%1.52%
TCEHY
Tencent Holdings Limited
0.69%0.81%6.84%4.22%0.35%0.21%0.26%0.29%0.15%0.25%0.23%0.04%

Drawdowns

SNN vs. TCEHY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNN drawdown since its inception was -55.20%, smaller than the maximum TCEHY drawdown of -73.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNN and TCEHY. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-45.00%-40.00%-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-36.71%
-29.05%
SNN
TCEHY

Volatility

SNN vs. TCEHY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Smith & Nephew plc (SNN) is 7.23%, while Tencent Holdings Limited (TCEHY) has a volatility of 8.61%. This indicates that SNN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TCEHY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
7.23%
8.61%
SNN
TCEHY

Financials

SNN vs. TCEHY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Smith & Nephew plc and Tencent Holdings Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00B100.00B150.00BAprilJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober
2.98B
172.45B
(SNN) Total Revenue
(TCEHY) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SNN vs. TCEHY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Smith & Nephew plc and Tencent Holdings Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%45.0%50.0%55.0%60.0%65.0%70.0%75.0%AprilJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober
69.5%
52.6%
(SNN) Gross Margin
(TCEHY) Gross Margin
SNN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Smith & Nephew plc reported a gross profit of 2.07B and revenue of 2.98B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 69.5%.

TCEHY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Tencent Holdings Limited reported a gross profit of 90.71B and revenue of 172.45B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.6%.

SNN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Smith & Nephew plc reported an operating income of 329.00M and revenue of 2.98B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.0%.

TCEHY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Tencent Holdings Limited reported an operating income of 51.48B and revenue of 172.45B, resulting in an operating margin of 29.9%.

SNN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Smith & Nephew plc reported a net income of 198.00M and revenue of 2.98B, resulting in a net margin of 6.6%.

TCEHY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Tencent Holdings Limited reported a net income of 51.32B and revenue of 172.45B, resulting in a net margin of 29.8%.