SNN vs. TCEHY

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SNN (Smith & Nephew plc) and TCEHY (Tencent Holdings Limited) are both stocks. SNN operates in Medical Devices (Healthcare), while TCEHY operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services). Over the past 10 years, SNN returned 0.76%/yr vs 11.67%/yr for TCEHY. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

SNN vs. TCEHY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Smith & Nephew plc (SNN) and Tencent Holdings Limited (TCEHY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNN achieves a -7.39% return, which is significantly higher than TCEHY's -23.18% return. Over the past 10 years, SNN has underperformed TCEHY with an annualized return of 0.76%, while TCEHY has yielded a comparatively higher 11.67% annualized return.

SNN

• 1D: 1.94%
• 1M: -3.14%
• YTD: -7.39%
• 6M: -7.82%
• 1Y: 5.21%
• 3Y*: 2.35%
• 5Y*: -4.25%
• 10Y*: 0.76%

TCEHY

• 1D: -3.65%
• 1M: -2.67%
• YTD: -23.18%
• 6M: -25.09%
• 1Y: -8.48%
• 3Y*: 11.82%
• 5Y*: -3.82%
• 10Y*: 11.67%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNN vs. TCEHY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SNN Smith & Nephew plc	-7.39%	36.82%	-7.34%	4.44%	-20.20%	-16.21%	-10.40%	30.84%	8.90%	18.57%
TCEHY Tencent Holdings Limited	-23.18%	45.23%	41.92%	-5.48%	-24.97%	-18.69%	50.09%	21.93%	-23.83%	115.30%

Correlation

The correlation between SNN and TCEHY is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.10
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.21
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.25
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.29
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2008	0.28

The correlation between SNN and TCEHY shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (1 year) to 0.29 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap SNN : $13.06B TCEHY : $533.23B
EPS SNN : $2.37 TCEHY : $25.30
PE Ratio SNN : 12.63 TCEHY : 2.30
PEG Ratio SNN : 0.44 TCEHY : 0.29
PS Ratio SNN : 1.09 TCEHY : 0.70
PB Ratio SNN : 2.47 TCEHY : 0.47
Total Revenue (TTM) SNN : $11.99B TCEHY : $763.32B
Gross Profit (TTM) SNN : $8.25B TCEHY : $422.60B
EBITDA (TTM) SNN : $2.82B TCEHY : $324.78B

Return for Risk

SNN vs. TCEHY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNN

SNN Risk / Return Rank: 44
SNN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
SNN Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
SNN Omega Ratio Rank: 42
SNN Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
SNN Martin Ratio Rank: 46

TCEHY

TCEHY Risk / Return Rank: 29
TCEHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
TCEHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
TCEHY Omega Ratio Rank: 25
TCEHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
TCEHY Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNN vs. TCEHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Smith & Nephew plc (SNN) and Tencent Holdings Limited (TCEHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SNN	TCEHY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.18	-0.28	+0.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.47	-0.21	+0.69
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	0.98	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.23	-0.23	+0.46
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.47	-0.51	+0.98
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SNN vs. TCEHY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNN Sharpe Ratio is 0.18, which is higher than the TCEHY Sharpe Ratio of -0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNN and TCEHY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SNN	TCEHY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.18	-0.28	+0.45
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.16	-0.09	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.03	0.30	-0.27
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.28	0.65	-0.37

Drawdowns

SNN vs. TCEHY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNN drawdown since its inception was -55.20%, smaller than the maximum TCEHY drawdown of -73.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNN and TCEHY.

Drawdown Indicators

	SNN	TCEHY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.20%	-73.17%	+17.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.03%	-36.75%	+13.72%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-32.36%	-36.75%	+4.39%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-49.18%	-66.67%	+17.49%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-55.06%	-73.17%	+18.11%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-31.62%	-33.77%	+2.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.64%	-19.66%	+2.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.20%	16.55%	-5.35%

Volatility

SNN vs. TCEHY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Smith & Nephew plc (SNN) is 7.37%, while Tencent Holdings Limited (TCEHY) has a volatility of 12.73%. This indicates that SNN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TCEHY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SNN	TCEHY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.37%	12.73%	-5.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.54%	24.43%	-6.89%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.55%	30.75%	-1.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.08%	43.23%	-16.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.91%	38.84%	-11.93%

Dividends

SNN vs. TCEHY - Dividend Comparison

SNN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, more than TCEHY's 1.16% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SNN Smith & Nephew plc	2.61%	2.32%	3.05%	2.75%	2.79%	2.17%	1.78%	1.51%	1.96%	1.76%	2.08%	1.68%
TCEHY Tencent Holdings Limited	1.16%	0.76%	0.82%	6.67%	4.15%	0.35%	0.19%	0.23%	0.26%	0.29%	0.51%	0.21%

Financials

SNN vs. TCEHY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Smith & Nephew plc and Tencent Holdings Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

SNN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Smith & Nephew plc reported a gross profit of 2.09B and revenue of 3.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 65.6%.

TCEHY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tencent Holdings Limited reported a gross profit of 106.58B and revenue of 195.27B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 54.6%.

SNN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Smith & Nephew plc reported an operating income of 570.45M and revenue of 3.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.9%.

TCEHY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tencent Holdings Limited reported an operating income of 65.72B and revenue of 195.27B, resulting in an operating margin of 33.7%.

SNN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Smith & Nephew plc reported a net income of 330.82M and revenue of 3.19B, resulting in a net margin of 10.4%.

TCEHY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tencent Holdings Limited reported a net income of 57.74B and revenue of 195.27B, resulting in a net margin of 29.6%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SNN and TCEHY in my portfolio?

SNN and TCEHY have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SNN or TCEHY?

TCEHY has higher volatility (12.73%) compared to SNN (7.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNN dropped -55.20% vs TCEHY's -73.17%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SNN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.18 vs -0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.