PortfoliosLab logo
SNN vs. ZBH
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between SNN and ZBH is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

SNN vs. ZBH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Smith & Nephew plc (SNN) and Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. (ZBH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

260.00%280.00%300.00%320.00%340.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
324.49%
268.69%
SNN
ZBH

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

SNN:

0.58

ZBH:

-0.81

Sortino Ratio

SNN:

0.95

ZBH:

-0.93

Omega Ratio

SNN:

1.15

ZBH:

0.86

Calmar Ratio

SNN:

0.35

ZBH:

-0.45

Martin Ratio

SNN:

1.34

ZBH:

-1.82

Ulcer Index

SNN:

12.40%

ZBH:

11.51%

Daily Std Dev

SNN:

27.76%

ZBH:

25.99%

Max Drawdown

SNN:

-55.20%

ZBH:

-65.03%

Current Drawdown

SNN:

-36.71%

ZBH:

-43.28%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SNN:

$12.57B

ZBH:

$20.25B

EPS

SNN:

$0.94

ZBH:

$4.43

PE Ratio

SNN:

30.45

ZBH:

23.11

PEG Ratio

SNN:

0.95

ZBH:

1.27

PS Ratio

SNN:

2.16

ZBH:

2.66

PB Ratio

SNN:

2.38

ZBH:

1.63

Total Revenue (TTM)

SNN:

$5.81B

ZBH:

$7.70B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SNN:

$4.05B

ZBH:

$5.11B

EBITDA (TTM)

SNN:

$1.24B

ZBH:

$1.79B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNN achieves a 17.20% return, which is significantly higher than ZBH's -9.67% return. Over the past 10 years, SNN has outperformed ZBH with an annualized return of 0.08%, while ZBH has yielded a comparatively lower -0.54% annualized return.


SNN

YTD

17.20%

1M

9.63%

6M

18.60%

1Y

16.07%

5Y*

-4.54%

10Y*

0.08%

ZBH

YTD

-9.67%

1M

-7.96%

6M

-11.60%

1Y

-20.90%

5Y*

-3.50%

10Y*

-0.54%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

SNN vs. ZBH — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SNN is 6868
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SNN is 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SNN is 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SNN is 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SNN is 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SNN is 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

ZBH
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ZBH is 1212
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ZBH is 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ZBH is 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ZBH is 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ZBH is 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ZBH is 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

SNN vs. ZBH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Smith & Nephew plc (SNN) and Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. (ZBH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current SNN Sharpe Ratio is 0.58, which is higher than the ZBH Sharpe Ratio of -0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNN and ZBH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.50December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.58
-0.81
SNN
ZBH

Dividends

SNN vs. ZBH - Dividend Comparison

SNN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%, more than ZBH's 1.01% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
SNN
Smith & Nephew plc
2.65%3.05%2.75%2.79%2.17%1.78%1.51%1.96%1.76%2.08%1.71%1.52%
ZBH
Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.
1.01%0.91%0.79%0.75%0.76%0.62%0.64%0.93%0.80%0.93%0.86%0.78%

Drawdowns

SNN vs. ZBH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNN drawdown since its inception was -55.20%, smaller than the maximum ZBH drawdown of -65.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNN and ZBH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-45.00%-40.00%-35.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-36.71%
-43.28%
SNN
ZBH

Volatility

SNN vs. ZBH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Smith & Nephew plc (SNN) is 7.23%, while Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. (ZBH) has a volatility of 14.47%. This indicates that SNN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZBH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
7.23%
14.47%
SNN
ZBH

Financials

SNN vs. ZBH - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Smith & Nephew plc and Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B20212022202320242025
2.98B
1.91B
(SNN) Total Revenue
(ZBH) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SNN vs. ZBH - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Smith & Nephew plc and Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

60.0%62.0%64.0%66.0%68.0%70.0%72.0%20212022202320242025
69.5%
63.3%
(SNN) Gross Margin
(ZBH) Gross Margin
SNN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Smith & Nephew plc reported a gross profit of 2.07B and revenue of 2.98B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 69.5%.

ZBH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.21B and revenue of 1.91B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.3%.

SNN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Smith & Nephew plc reported an operating income of 329.00M and revenue of 2.98B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.0%.

ZBH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 338.90M and revenue of 1.91B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.8%.

SNN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Smith & Nephew plc reported a net income of 198.00M and revenue of 2.98B, resulting in a net margin of 6.6%.

ZBH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 182.00M and revenue of 1.91B, resulting in a net margin of 9.5%.