SNN vs. ZBH
Compare and contrast key facts about Smith & Nephew plc (SNN) and Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. (ZBH).
Performance
SNN vs. ZBH - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SNN vs. ZBH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SNN Smith & Nephew plc | -1.67% | 36.82% | -7.34% | 4.44% | -20.20% | -16.21% | -10.40% | 30.84% | 8.90% | 18.57% |
ZBH Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. | 0.83% | -14.03% | -12.46% | -3.81% | 4.24% | -17.02% | 3.77% | 45.37% | -13.30% | 17.86% |
Fundamentals
SNN:
$2.37
ZBH:
$4.27
SNN:
13.41
ZBH:
21.16
SNN:
0.47
ZBH:
0.37
SNN:
1.16
ZBH:
5.33
SNN:
$11.99B
ZBH:
$2.24B
SNN:
$8.25B
ZBH:
$1.27B
SNN:
$2.82B
ZBH:
$1.76B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SNN achieves a -1.67% return, which is significantly lower than ZBH's 0.83% return. Over the past 10 years, SNN has outperformed ZBH with an annualized return of 1.85%, while ZBH has yielded a comparatively lower -0.60% annualized return.
SNN
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- -12.57%
- YTD
- -1.67%
- 6M
- -10.36%
- 1Y
- 14.66%
- 3Y*
- 7.24%
- 5Y*
- -0.79%
- 10Y*
- 1.85%
ZBH
- 1D
- 2.31%
- 1M
- -7.90%
- YTD
- 0.83%
- 6M
- -7.71%
- 1Y
- -19.27%
- 3Y*
- -10.42%
- 5Y*
- -9.50%
- 10Y*
- -0.60%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SNN vs. ZBH — Risk / Return Rank
SNN
ZBH
SNN vs. ZBH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Smith & Nephew plc (SNN) and Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. (ZBH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SNN | ZBH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.50 | -0.62 | +1.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.91 | -0.66 | +1.57 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 0.90 | +0.23 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.95 | -0.78 | +1.72 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.82 | -1.16 | +2.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SNN | ZBH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 | -0.62 | +1.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 | -0.37 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.07 | -0.02 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.19 | +0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between SNN and ZBH is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
SNN vs. ZBH - Dividend Comparison
SNN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%, more than ZBH's 1.06% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SNN Smith & Nephew plc | 2.46% | 2.32% | 3.05% | 2.75% | 2.79% | 2.17% | 1.78% | 1.51% | 1.96% | 1.76% | 2.08% | 1.68% |
ZBH Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. | 1.06% | 1.07% | 0.91% | 0.79% | 0.75% | 0.76% | 0.62% | 0.64% | 0.93% | 0.80% | 0.93% | 0.86% |
Drawdowns
SNN vs. ZBH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SNN drawdown since its inception was -55.20%, smaller than the maximum ZBH drawdown of -65.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNN and ZBH.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SNN | ZBH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.20% | -65.03% | +9.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.89% | -23.33% | +6.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.18% | -48.59% | -0.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.06% | -49.73% | -5.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.40% | -45.62% | +18.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.57% | -19.86% | +2.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.78% | 15.94% | -7.16% |
Volatility
SNN vs. ZBH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Smith & Nephew plc (SNN) is 6.86%, while Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. (ZBH) has a volatility of 7.59%. This indicates that SNN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZBH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SNN | ZBH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.86% | 7.59% | -0.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.81% | 23.32% | -3.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.61% | 31.06% | -1.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.88% | 26.04% | +0.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.74% | 28.11% | -1.37% |
Financials
SNN vs. ZBH - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Smith & Nephew plc and Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SNN vs. ZBH - Profitability Comparison
SNN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Smith & Nephew plc reported a gross profit of 2.09B and revenue of 3.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 65.6%.
ZBH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of -3.01B and revenue of -3.74B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 80.5%.
SNN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Smith & Nephew plc reported an operating income of 570.45M and revenue of 3.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.9%.
ZBH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of -3.74B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
SNN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Smith & Nephew plc reported a net income of 330.82M and revenue of 3.19B, resulting in a net margin of 10.4%.
ZBH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 0.00 and revenue of -3.74B, resulting in a net margin of 0.0%.