SNN vs. ZBH
Compare and contrast key facts about Smith & Nephew plc (SNN) and Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. (ZBH).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SNN or ZBH.
Correlation
The correlation between SNN and ZBH is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
SNN vs. ZBH - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
SNN:
-0.20
ZBH:
-0.44
SNN:
-0.09
ZBH:
-0.48
SNN:
0.99
ZBH:
0.94
SNN:
-0.10
ZBH:
-0.24
SNN:
-0.43
ZBH:
-0.64
SNN:
11.71%
ZBH:
15.01%
SNN:
25.90%
ZBH:
21.72%
SNN:
-55.20%
ZBH:
-65.03%
SNN:
-44.44%
ZBH:
-34.87%
Fundamentals
SNN:
$11.03B
ZBH:
$21.20B
SNN:
$0.71
ZBH:
$5.24
SNN:
35.62
ZBH:
20.33
SNN:
0.42
ZBH:
1.40
SNN:
$2.83B
ZBH:
$5.66B
SNN:
$1.97B
ZBH:
$3.63B
SNN:
$520.00M
ZBH:
$1.81B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SNN achieves a 2.89% return, which is significantly lower than ZBH's 3.72% return. Over the past 10 years, SNN has underperformed ZBH with an annualized return of -1.35%, while ZBH has yielded a comparatively higher 0.54% annualized return.
SNN
2.89%
1.61%
-9.74%
-7.26%
-10.28%
-1.35%
ZBH
3.72%
3.73%
-0.41%
-10.76%
-4.71%
0.54%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SNN vs. ZBH — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
SNN
ZBH
SNN vs. ZBH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Smith & Nephew plc (SNN) and Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. (ZBH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SNN vs. ZBH - Dividend Comparison
SNN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.97%, more than ZBH's 0.88% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SNN Smith & Nephew plc | 2.97% | 3.05% | 2.75% | 2.79% | 2.17% | 1.78% | 1.51% | 1.96% | 1.76% | 2.08% | 1.71% | 1.52% |
ZBH Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. | 0.88% | 0.91% | 0.79% | 0.75% | 0.76% | 0.62% | 0.64% | 0.93% | 0.80% | 0.93% | 0.86% | 0.78% |
Drawdowns
SNN vs. ZBH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SNN drawdown since its inception was -55.20%, smaller than the maximum ZBH drawdown of -65.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNN and ZBH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SNN vs. ZBH - Volatility Comparison
Smith & Nephew plc (SNN) and Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. (ZBH) have volatilities of 5.72% and 5.73%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
SNN vs. ZBH - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Smith & Nephew plc and Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities