PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HIGH vs. JBND
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HIGH vs. JBND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Enhanced Income ETF (HIGH) and Jpmorgan Active Bond ETF (JBND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HIGH achieves a -0.38% return, which is significantly lower than JBND's 0.22% return.


HIGH

1D
-0.32%
1M
1.63%
YTD
-0.38%
6M
-1.48%
1Y
-3.46%
3Y*
3.02%
5Y*
10Y*

JBND

1D
-0.19%
1M
0.27%
YTD
0.22%
6M
0.25%
1Y
5.68%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HIGH vs. JBND - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
HIGH
Simplify Enhanced Income ETF
-0.38%4.35%1.52%1.01%
JBND
Jpmorgan Active Bond ETF
0.22%8.21%3.19%7.76%

Correlation

The correlation between HIGH and JBND is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2023

0.06

HIGH vs. JBND - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HIGH
JBND

Financial Services

71.3%
9.0%

Basic Materials

-

0.8%

Communication Services

-

25.7%

Consumer Cyclical

-

0.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

0.1%

Energy

-

0.6%

Healthcare

-

3.1%

Industrials

-

0.5%

Real Estate

-

2.6%

Technology

-

19.7%

Utilities

-

0.7%

Financial Services

HIGH
71.3%
JBND
9.0%

Basic Materials

HIGH

-

JBND
0.8%

Communication Services

HIGH

-

JBND
25.7%

Consumer Cyclical

HIGH

-

JBND
0.3%

Consumer Defensive

HIGH

-

JBND
0.1%

Energy

HIGH

-

JBND
0.6%

Healthcare

HIGH

-

JBND
3.1%

Industrials

HIGH

-

JBND
0.5%

Real Estate

HIGH

-

JBND
2.6%

Technology

HIGH

-

JBND
19.7%

Utilities

HIGH

-

JBND
0.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HIGH vs. JBND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HIGH
HIGH Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
HIGH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIGH Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIGH Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
HIGH Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIGH Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

JBND
JBND Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
JBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
JBND Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
JBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
JBND Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HIGH vs. JBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Enhanced Income ETF (HIGH) and Jpmorgan Active Bond ETF (JBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HIGHJBNDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

1.26

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.37

1.94

-2.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.53

5.97

-6.50

HIGH vs. JBND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HIGH Sharpe Ratio is -0.39, which is lower than the JBND Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HIGH and JBND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HIGHJBNDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.39

1.49

-1.89

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

1.53

-1.14

Drawdowns

HIGH vs. JBND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIGH drawdown since its inception was -9.50%, which is greater than JBND's maximum drawdown of -4.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIGH and JBND.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HIGHJBNDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.50%

-4.48%

-5.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.50%

-2.94%

-6.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.11%

-1.74%

-5.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.37%

-1.15%

-1.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.53%

0.95%

+5.58%

Volatility

HIGH vs. JBND - Volatility Comparison

Simplify Enhanced Income ETF (HIGH) and Jpmorgan Active Bond ETF (JBND) have volatilities of 1.23% and 1.20%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HIGHJBNDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.23%

1.20%

+0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.50%

2.67%

+0.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.83%

3.82%

+5.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.56%

4.84%

+4.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.56%

4.84%

+4.72%

HIGH vs. JBND - Expense Ratio Comparison

HIGH has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is higher than JBND's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

HIGH vs. JBND - Dividend Comparison

HIGH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.33%, more than JBND's 4.41% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
HIGH
Simplify Enhanced Income ETF
7.33%7.71%8.34%9.40%0.62%
JBND
Jpmorgan Active Bond ETF
4.41%4.42%4.58%1.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HIGH and JBND have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HIGH has higher volatility (1.23%) compared to JBND (1.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HIGH dropped -9.50% vs JBND's -4.48%.

On 1-year performance, JBND leads with 5.68% vs -3.46% for HIGH. On fees, JBND is cheaper at 0.30% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, JBND has performed better with a 5.68% return vs -3.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JBND is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for HIGH.

HIGH has the higher dividend yield at 7.33%, compared with 4.41% for JBND.

HIGH is categorized as Derivative Income, while JBND is Intermediate Core Bond. They also come from different issuers: Simplify and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.51% for HIGH and 0.30% for JBND.

JBND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs -0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HIGH and JBND

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer