PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
HIGH.L vs. XYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

HIGH.L vs. XYLD

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

HIGH.L (iShares EUR High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)) and XYLD (Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HIGH.L is a European High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Pan Euro HY Euro TR EUR, while XYLD is a Derivative Income fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HIGH.L returned 2.71%/yr vs 8.76%/yr for XYLD. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HIGH.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for XYLD.

Performance

HIGH.L vs. XYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares EUR High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (HIGH.L) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HIGH.L is traded in EUR, while XYLD is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XYLD values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HIGH.L achieves a 1.03% return, which is significantly lower than XYLD's 6.34% return.

HIGH.L

1D
0.13%
1M
0.90%
YTD
1.03%
6M
1.37%
1Y
3.20%
3Y*
6.34%
5Y*
2.71%
10Y*
—

XYLD

1D
0.03%
1M
2.55%
YTD
6.34%
6M
6.82%
1Y
15.85%
3Y*
8.33%
5Y*
8.76%
10Y*
8.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HIGH.L vs. XYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HIGH.L
iShares EUR High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)		1.03%4.81%5.78%11.51%-9.32%2.82%1.10%9.76%-3.46%0.37%
XYLD
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF		6.34%-4.80%27.38%7.77%-6.60%28.53%-8.75%24.15%-1.69%3.87%

Correlation

The correlation between HIGH.L and XYLD is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2017

0.20

The correlation between HIGH.L and XYLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (3 years) to 0.22 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HIGH.L vs. XYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
HIGH.L
XYLD

Financial Services

100.0%
11.8%

Basic Materials

-

1.8%

Communication Services

-

11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.9%

Energy

-

3.5%

Healthcare

-

8.5%

Industrials

-

8.3%

Real Estate

-

1.9%

Technology

-

35.6%

Utilities

-

2.3%

Financial Services

HIGH.L
100.0%
XYLD
11.8%

Basic Materials

HIGH.L

-

XYLD
1.8%

Communication Services

HIGH.L

-

XYLD
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

HIGH.L

-

XYLD
10.2%

Consumer Defensive

HIGH.L

-

XYLD
4.9%

Energy

HIGH.L

-

XYLD
3.5%

Healthcare

HIGH.L

-

XYLD
8.5%

Industrials

HIGH.L

-

XYLD
8.3%

Real Estate

HIGH.L

-

XYLD
1.9%

Technology

HIGH.L

-

XYLD
35.6%

Utilities

HIGH.L

-

XYLD
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares EUR High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)

Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF

Often compared with HIGH.L:
HIGH.L vs. SGOVHIGH.L vs. ARCCHIGH.L vs. EUNW.DEHIGH.L vs. SPYIHIGH.L vs. JEPQHIGH.L vs. SPYHIGH.L vs. IEAA.L
Often compared with XYLD:
XYLD vs. JEPIXYLD vs. QYLDXYLD vs. SPYXYLD vs. RYLDXYLD vs. XYLGXYLD vs. VOOXYLD vs. SCHD

Return for Risk

HIGH.L vs. XYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
HIGH.L
HIGH.L Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
HIGH.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIGH.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIGH.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
HIGH.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIGH.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
XYLD
XYLD Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
XYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
XYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
XYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
XYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HIGH.L vs. XYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares EUR High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (HIGH.L) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

HIGH.LXYLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.92
1.89

-0.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.47
2.58

-1.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.37

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.11

4.09

-2.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.65

12.88

-8.24

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HIGH.L vs. XYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HIGH.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is lower than the XYLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HIGH.L and XYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

HIGH.LXYLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

1.89

-0.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.71

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.51

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.59

-0.23

Drawdowns

HIGH.L vs. XYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIGH.L drawdown since its inception was -25.42%, smaller than the maximum XYLD drawdown of -33.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIGH.L and XYLD.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

HIGH.LXYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.42%

-33.01%

+7.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.88%

-3.89%

+1.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.70%

-20.24%

+16.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.64%

-20.24%

+5.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-33.01%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.14%

-1.85%

+1.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.72%

-5.53%

+2.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.69%

1.23%

-0.54%

Volatility

HIGH.L vs. XYLD - Volatility Comparison

iShares EUR High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (HIGH.L) has a higher volatility of 1.09% compared to Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) at 0.91%. This indicates that HIGH.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

HIGH.LXYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.09%

0.91%

+0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.91%

5.86%

-2.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.46%

8.44%

-4.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.32%

12.47%

-7.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.15%

15.67%

-8.52%

HIGH.L vs. XYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

HIGH.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than XYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

HIGH.L vs. XYLD - Dividend Comparison

HIGH.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.50%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HIGH.L
iShares EUR High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XYLD
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF		10.50%10.51%11.54%10.51%13.43%9.07%7.93%5.76%7.12%5.18%3.23%4.65%

Frequently Asked Questions

HIGH.L and XYLD have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HIGH.L is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HIGH.L is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for XYLD.

HIGH.L is categorized as European High Yield Bonds, while XYLD is Derivative Income. HIGH.L tracks Bloomberg Pan Euro HY Euro TR EUR, while XYLD tracks Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HIGH.L and 0.60% for XYLD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HIGH.L and XYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer