PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HIG.TO vs. KNGC.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HIG.TO vs. KNGC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Brompton Global Healthcare Income & Growth ETF (HIG.TO) and Brompton Canadian Cash Flow Kings ETF (KNGC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HIG.TO achieves a -3.42% return, which is significantly lower than KNGC.TO's 14.18% return.


HIG.TO

1D
0.55%
1M
2.42%
6M
-5.56%
YTD
-3.42%
1Y
8.20%
3Y*
3.66%
5Y*
0.67%
10Y*
5.22%

KNGC.TO

1D
-0.12%
1M
-3.40%
6M
9.46%
YTD
14.18%
1Y
37.43%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HIG.TO vs. KNGC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
HIG.TO
Brompton Global Healthcare Income & Growth ETF
-3.42%13.94%-8.15%
KNGC.TO
Brompton Canadian Cash Flow Kings ETF
14.18%41.07%-4.91%

Correlation

The correlation between HIG.TO and KNGC.TO is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2024

0.07

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HIG.TO vs. KNGC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HIG.TO
HIG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
HIG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
HIG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

KNGC.TO
KNGC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
KNGC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KNGC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
KNGC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
KNGC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
KNGC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HIG.TO vs. KNGC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brompton Global Healthcare Income & Growth ETF (HIG.TO) and Brompton Canadian Cash Flow Kings ETF (KNGC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HIG.TOKNGC.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.58

-0.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.58

6.63

-6.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.37

22.55

-21.18

HIG.TO vs. KNGC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HIG.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is lower than the KNGC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HIG.TO and KNGC.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HIG.TO vs. KNGC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIG.TO drawdown since its inception was -31.83%, which is greater than KNGC.TO's maximum drawdown of -25.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIG.TO and KNGC.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HIG.TOKNGC.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.83%

-25.52%

-6.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.18%

-5.67%

-8.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.98%

-4.84%

-3.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.17%

-4.63%

-3.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.01%

1.67%

+4.34%

Volatility

HIG.TO vs. KNGC.TO - Volatility Comparison

Brompton Global Healthcare Income & Growth ETF (HIG.TO) has a higher volatility of 6.30% compared to Brompton Canadian Cash Flow Kings ETF (KNGC.TO) at 3.19%. This indicates that HIG.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KNGC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HIG.TOKNGC.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.30%

3.19%

+3.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.16%

9.55%

+1.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.83%

12.67%

+2.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.16%

17.60%

-2.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.37%

17.60%

-0.23%

Dividends

HIG.TO vs. KNGC.TO - Dividend Comparison

HIG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.00%, more than KNGC.TO's 1.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HIG.TO
Brompton Global Healthcare Income & Growth ETF
9.00%8.32%8.71%8.03%6.97%5.29%6.22%6.12%7.11%6.43%6.47%1.80%
KNGC.TO
Brompton Canadian Cash Flow Kings ETF
1.63%1.69%0.78%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HIG.TO and KNGC.TO have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HIG.TO is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while KNGC.TO is Canada Equities.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HIG.TO and KNGC.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer