HIDV vs. LRGC

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about AB US High Dividend ETF (HIDV) and AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF (LRGC).

HIDV and LRGC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HIDV is an actively managed fund by AllianceBernstein. It was launched on Mar 21, 2023. LRGC is an actively managed fund by AllianceBernstein. It was launched on Sep 19, 2023.

Performance

HIDV vs. LRGC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB US High Dividend ETF (HIDV) and AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF (LRGC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

HIDV vs. LRGC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
HIDV AB US High Dividend ETF	-3.14%	14.64%	26.01%	8.57%
LRGC AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF	-5.45%	16.23%	24.92%	9.30%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HIDV achieves a -3.14% return, which is significantly higher than LRGC's -5.45% return.

HIDV

• 1D: 2.77%
• 1M: -5.13%
• YTD: -3.14%
• 6M: -0.28%
• 1Y: 15.00%
• 3Y*: 17.82%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LRGC

• 1D: 2.88%
• 1M: -4.95%
• YTD: -5.45%
• 6M: -3.88%
• 1Y: 15.27%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HIDV vs. LRGC - Expense Ratio Comparison

HIDV has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than LRGC's 0.48% expense ratio.

LRGC

AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

HIDV

AB US High Dividend ETF

Return for Risk

HIDV vs. LRGC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HIDV

HIDV Risk / Return Rank: 49
HIDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
HIDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
HIDV Omega Ratio Rank: 53
HIDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
HIDV Martin Ratio Rank: 54

LRGC

LRGC Risk / Return Rank: 51
LRGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
LRGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
LRGC Omega Ratio Rank: 51
LRGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
LRGC Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HIDV vs. LRGC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB US High Dividend ETF (HIDV) and AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF (LRGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HIDV	LRGC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.84	0.85	-0.01
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.29	1.34	-0.05
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.20	0.00
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.16	1.36	-0.20
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.21	5.56	-0.35
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HIDV vs. LRGC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HIDV Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is comparable to the LRGC Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HIDV and LRGC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HIDV	LRGC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84	0.85	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.33	1.14	+0.20

Correlation

The correlation between HIDV and LRGC is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

HIDV vs. LRGC - Dividend Comparison

HIDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, more than LRGC's 0.61% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
HIDV AB US High Dividend ETF	2.59%	2.22%	2.29%	2.23%
LRGC AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF	0.61%	0.58%	0.46%	0.17%

Drawdowns

HIDV vs. LRGC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIDV drawdown since its inception was -18.76%, roughly equal to the maximum LRGC drawdown of -19.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIDV and LRGC.

Drawdown Indicators

	HIDV	LRGC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.76%	-19.38%	+0.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.62%	-11.76%	-1.86%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.06%	-7.41%	+0.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.11%	-2.22%	+0.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.04%	2.88%	+0.16%

Volatility

HIDV vs. LRGC - Volatility Comparison

AB US High Dividend ETF (HIDV) and AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF (LRGC) have volatilities of 5.16% and 5.35%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HIDV	LRGC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.16%	5.35%	-0.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.32%	9.35%	-0.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.05%	18.06%	-0.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.64%	15.42%	-0.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.64%	15.42%	-0.78%