PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HIDV vs. ILOW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HIDV vs. ILOW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB US High Dividend ETF (HIDV) and AB International Low Volatility Equity ETF (ILOW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HIDV achieves a 11.35% return, which is significantly higher than ILOW's 5.98% return.


HIDV

1D
0.36%
1M
4.19%
YTD
11.35%
6M
12.26%
1Y
29.26%
3Y*
22.30%
5Y*
10Y*

ILOW

1D
1.10%
1M
1.20%
YTD
5.98%
6M
7.96%
1Y
11.67%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HIDV vs. ILOW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
HIDV
AB US High Dividend ETF
11.35%14.64%4.61%
ILOW
AB International Low Volatility Equity ETF
5.98%26.99%-1.37%

Correlation

The correlation between HIDV and ILOW is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2024

0.65

The correlation between HIDV and ILOW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HIDV vs. ILOW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HIDV
HIDV Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
HIDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIDV Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
HIDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIDV Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

ILOW
ILOW Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
ILOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ILOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
ILOW Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
ILOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
ILOW Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HIDV vs. ILOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB US High Dividend ETF (HIDV) and AB International Low Volatility Equity ETF (ILOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HIDVILOWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.16

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.07

1.20

+1.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.38

4.65

+8.73

HIDV vs. ILOW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HIDV Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is higher than the ILOW Sharpe Ratio of 0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HIDV and ILOW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HIDVILOWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.47

0.87

+1.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.63

1.12

+0.51

Drawdowns

HIDV vs. ILOW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIDV drawdown since its inception was -18.76%, which is greater than ILOW's maximum drawdown of -10.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIDV and ILOW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HIDVILOWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.76%

-10.37%

-8.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.57%

-9.80%

+0.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.60%

-1.00%

+0.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.05%

-2.11%

+0.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.19%

2.51%

-0.32%

Volatility

HIDV vs. ILOW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AB US High Dividend ETF (HIDV) is 2.88%, while AB International Low Volatility Equity ETF (ILOW) has a volatility of 4.42%. This indicates that HIDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ILOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HIDVILOWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.88%

4.42%

-1.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.03%

11.17%

-2.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.90%

13.43%

-1.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.51%

14.56%

-0.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.51%

14.56%

-0.05%

HIDV vs. ILOW - Expense Ratio Comparison

HIDV has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than ILOW's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

HIDV vs. ILOW - Dividend Comparison

HIDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.26%, more than ILOW's 1.51% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
HIDV
AB US High Dividend ETF
2.26%2.22%2.29%2.23%
ILOW
AB International Low Volatility Equity ETF
1.51%1.60%0.78%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HIDV and ILOW have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ILOW has higher volatility (4.42%) compared to HIDV (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HIDV dropped -18.76% vs ILOW's -10.37%.

On 1-year performance, HIDV leads with 29.26% vs 11.67% for ILOW. On fees, HIDV is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, HIDV has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, HIDV has performed better with a 29.26% return vs 11.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HIDV is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for ILOW.

HIDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.26%, compared with 1.51% for ILOW.

HIDV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while ILOW is Foreign Large Cap Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for HIDV and 0.50% for ILOW.

HIDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HIDV and ILOW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer