HIDV vs. EMOP
HIDV (AB US High Dividend ETF) and EMOP (AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HIDV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by AllianceBernstein, while EMOP is a Emerging Markets Equities fund actively managed by AllianceBernstein. Both are actively managed. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HIDV charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for EMOP.
Performance
HIDV vs. EMOP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HIDV achieves a 11.35% return, which is significantly lower than EMOP's 32.56% return.
HIDV
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- 4.19%
- YTD
- 11.35%
- 6M
- 12.26%
- 1Y
- 29.26%
- 3Y*
- 22.30%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EMOP
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- 8.86%
- YTD
- 32.56%
- 6M
- 34.94%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HIDV vs. EMOP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HIDV AB US High Dividend ETF | 11.35% | 15.25% |
EMOP AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF | 32.56% | 16.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between HIDV and EMOP is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2025 | 0.68 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HIDV vs. EMOP — Risk / Return Rank
HIDV
EMOP
HIDV vs. EMOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB US High Dividend ETF (HIDV) and AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF (EMOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HIDV | EMOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.07 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.38 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HIDV | EMOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.47 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.63 | 2.93 | -1.30 |
Drawdowns
HIDV vs. EMOP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HIDV drawdown since its inception was -18.76%, which is greater than EMOP's maximum drawdown of -12.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIDV and EMOP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HIDV | EMOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.76% | -12.88% | -5.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.57% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.76% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.60% | -0.72% | +0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.05% | -1.90% | -0.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.19% | — | — |
Volatility
HIDV vs. EMOP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HIDV | EMOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.88% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.03% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.90% | 19.85% | -7.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.51% | 19.85% | -5.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.51% | 19.85% | -5.34% |
HIDV vs. EMOP - Expense Ratio Comparison
HIDV has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than EMOP's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
HIDV vs. EMOP - Dividend Comparison
HIDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.26%, more than EMOP's 0.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
EMOP AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF | 0.82% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HIDV AB US High Dividend ETF | 2.26% | 2.22% | 2.29% | 2.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HIDV and EMOP have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HIDV is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HIDV is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for EMOP.
HIDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.26%, compared with 0.82% for EMOP.
HIDV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while EMOP is Emerging Markets Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for HIDV and 0.70% for EMOP.
Find the right allocation for HIDV and EMOP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer