HIDV vs. DBE
HIDV (AB US High Dividend ETF) and DBE (Invesco DB Energy Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - HIDV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by AllianceBernstein, while DBE is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Energy Index. HIDV is actively managed, while DBE is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, HIDV returned 22.01%/yr vs 23.42%/yr for DBE. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. HIDV charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBE.
Performance
HIDV vs. DBE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HIDV achieves a 10.96% return, which is significantly lower than DBE's 83.68% return.
HIDV
- 1D
- -0.95%
- 1M
- 4.84%
- YTD
- 10.96%
- 6M
- 11.82%
- 1Y
- 28.51%
- 3Y*
- 22.01%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DBE
- 1D
- 2.33%
- 1M
- -5.45%
- YTD
- 83.68%
- 6M
- 74.95%
- 1Y
- 84.41%
- 3Y*
- 23.42%
- 5Y*
- 19.66%
- 10Y*
- 12.03%
HIDV vs. DBE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HIDV AB US High Dividend ETF | 10.96% | 14.64% | 26.01% | 22.21% |
DBE Invesco DB Energy Fund | 83.68% | -2.17% | 2.96% | 0.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between HIDV and DBE is -0.33, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2023 | -0.02 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between HIDV and DBE has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.02 to -0.33, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HIDV vs. DBE — Risk / Return Rank
HIDV
DBE
HIDV vs. DBE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB US High Dividend ETF (HIDV) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HIDV | DBE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.40 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.99 | 5.89 | -2.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.04 | 11.53 | +1.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HIDV | DBE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.41 | 2.43 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.67 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.43 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.62 | 0.09 | +1.53 |
Drawdowns
HIDV vs. DBE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HIDV drawdown since its inception was -18.76%, smaller than the maximum DBE drawdown of -86.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIDV and DBE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HIDV | DBE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.76% | -86.69% | +67.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.57% | -14.41% | +4.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.76% | -23.89% | +5.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -38.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -60.84% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.95% | -30.27% | +29.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.05% | -57.31% | +55.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.19% | 7.35% | -5.16% |
Volatility
HIDV vs. DBE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AB US High Dividend ETF (HIDV) is 2.98%, while Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE) has a volatility of 12.95%. This indicates that HIDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HIDV | DBE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.98% | 12.95% | -9.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.02% | 30.86% | -21.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.91% | 34.97% | -23.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.52% | 29.39% | -14.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.52% | 28.33% | -13.81% |
HIDV vs. DBE - Expense Ratio Comparison
HIDV has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than DBE's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
HIDV vs. DBE - Dividend Comparison
HIDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.27%, more than DBE's 2.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBE Invesco DB Energy Fund | 2.10% | 3.86% | 6.32% | 3.87% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.79% | 1.67% |
HIDV AB US High Dividend ETF | 2.27% | 2.22% | 2.29% | 2.23% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HIDV and DBE have a correlation of -0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DBE has higher volatility (12.95%) compared to HIDV (2.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HIDV dropped -18.76% vs DBE's -86.69%.
On 3-year performance, DBE leads with 23.42% vs 22.01% for HIDV. On fees, HIDV is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, HIDV has been the lower-risk option at 2.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DBE has performed better with a 23.42% return vs 22.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HIDV is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBE.
HIDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.27%, compared with 2.10% for DBE.
HIDV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while DBE is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: AllianceBernstein and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for HIDV and 0.78% for DBE.
DBE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 2.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HIDV and DBE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer