HIDV vs. CSTK
HIDV (AB US High Dividend ETF) and CSTK (Invesco Comstock Contrarian Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, HIDV returned 29.26% vs 28.37% for CSTK. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HIDV charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for CSTK.
Performance
HIDV vs. CSTK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HIDV achieves a 11.35% return, which is significantly lower than CSTK's 12.69% return.
HIDV
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- 4.19%
- YTD
- 11.35%
- 6M
- 12.26%
- 1Y
- 29.26%
- 3Y*
- 22.30%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CSTK
- 1D
- 1.25%
- 1M
- 4.25%
- YTD
- 12.69%
- 6M
- 14.56%
- 1Y
- 28.37%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HIDV vs. CSTK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HIDV AB US High Dividend ETF | 11.35% | 22.00% |
CSTK Invesco Comstock Contrarian Equity ETF | 12.69% | 18.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between HIDV and CSTK is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2025 | 0.78 |
The correlation between HIDV and CSTK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HIDV vs. CSTK — Risk / Return Rank
HIDV
CSTK
HIDV vs. CSTK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB US High Dividend ETF (HIDV) and Invesco Comstock Contrarian Equity ETF (CSTK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HIDV | CSTK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.45 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.07 | 3.21 | -0.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.38 | 12.59 | +0.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HIDV | CSTK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.47 | 2.52 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.63 | 2.65 | -1.02 |
Drawdowns
HIDV vs. CSTK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HIDV drawdown since its inception was -18.76%, which is greater than CSTK's maximum drawdown of -8.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIDV and CSTK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HIDV | CSTK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.76% | -8.87% | -9.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.57% | -8.87% | -0.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.76% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.60% | 0.00% | -0.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.05% | -1.27% | -0.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.19% | 2.26% | -0.07% |
Volatility
HIDV vs. CSTK - Volatility Comparison
AB US High Dividend ETF (HIDV) and Invesco Comstock Contrarian Equity ETF (CSTK) have volatilities of 2.88% and 2.86%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HIDV | CSTK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.88% | 2.86% | +0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.03% | 8.52% | +0.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.90% | 11.32% | +0.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.51% | 11.64% | +2.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.51% | 11.64% | +2.87% |
HIDV vs. CSTK - Expense Ratio Comparison
HIDV has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than CSTK's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
HIDV vs. CSTK - Dividend Comparison
HIDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.26%, more than CSTK's 1.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CSTK Invesco Comstock Contrarian Equity ETF | 1.75% | 1.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HIDV AB US High Dividend ETF | 2.26% | 2.22% | 2.29% | 2.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HIDV and CSTK have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HIDV has higher volatility (2.88%) compared to CSTK (2.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HIDV dropped -18.76% vs CSTK's -8.87%.
On 1-year performance, HIDV leads with 29.26% vs 28.37% for CSTK. On fees, CSTK is cheaper at 0.35% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, HIDV has performed better with a 29.26% return vs 28.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CSTK is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for HIDV.
HIDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.26%, compared with 1.75% for CSTK.
They also come from different issuers: AllianceBernstein and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for HIDV and 0.35% for CSTK.
CSTK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 2.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HIDV and CSTK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer