HIDE vs. MFUL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HIDE (Alpha Architect High Inflation And Deflation ETF) and MFUL (Mindful Conservative ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, HIDE returned 4.42%/yr vs 4.96%/yr for MFUL. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HIDE charges 0.29%/yr vs 1.10%/yr for MFUL.

Performance

HIDE vs. MFUL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpha Architect High Inflation And Deflation ETF (HIDE) and Mindful Conservative ETF (MFUL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HIDE achieves a 6.79% return, which is significantly higher than MFUL's 3.28% return.

HIDE

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: -1.06%
• YTD: 6.79%
• 6M: 6.65%
• 1Y: 10.85%
• 3Y*: 4.42%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MFUL

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: 1.45%
• YTD: 3.28%
• 6M: 3.33%
• 1Y: 7.13%
• 3Y*: 4.96%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HIDE vs. MFUL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
HIDE Alpha Architect High Inflation And Deflation ETF	6.79%	5.32%	-0.85%	2.46%	-0.03%
MFUL Mindful Conservative ETF	3.28%	4.51%	5.36%	2.24%	0.48%

Correlation

The correlation between HIDE and MFUL is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.27
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2022	0.43

The correlation between HIDE and MFUL shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (1 year) to 0.45 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HIDE vs. MFUL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HIDE	MFUL
Real Estate	99.2%	2.4%
Communication Services	0.6%	8.4%
Energy	0.1%	8.0%
Industrials	0.0%	9.9%
Basic Materials	-	5.5%
Consumer Cyclical	-	8.7%
Consumer Defensive	-	6.7%
Financial Services	-	10.7%
Healthcare	-	8.4%
Technology	-	25.8%
Utilities	-	5.5%

Return for Risk

HIDE vs. MFUL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HIDE

HIDE Risk / Return Rank: 81
HIDE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
HIDE Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
HIDE Omega Ratio Rank: 82
HIDE Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
HIDE Martin Ratio Rank: 88

MFUL

MFUL Risk / Return Rank: 52
MFUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
MFUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
MFUL Omega Ratio Rank: 58
MFUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
MFUL Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HIDE vs. MFUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect High Inflation And Deflation ETF (HIDE) and Mindful Conservative ETF (MFUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HIDE	MFUL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.46	1.82	+0.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.46	2.59	+0.87
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.50	1.35	+0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.72	2.13	+2.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.36	8.24	+11.12
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HIDE vs. MFUL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HIDE Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is higher than the MFUL Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HIDE and MFUL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HIDE	MFUL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.46	1.82	+0.64
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.91	0.01	+0.90

Drawdowns

HIDE vs. MFUL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIDE drawdown since its inception was -5.15%, smaller than the maximum MFUL drawdown of -16.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIDE and MFUL.

Drawdown Indicators

	HIDE	MFUL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.15%	-16.41%	+11.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.31%	-3.36%	+1.05%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.15%	-4.74%	-0.41%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.73%	-0.46%	-1.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.94%	-9.50%	+8.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.56%	0.87%	-0.31%

Volatility

HIDE vs. MFUL - Volatility Comparison

Alpha Architect High Inflation And Deflation ETF (HIDE) and Mindful Conservative ETF (MFUL) have volatilities of 1.45% and 1.46%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HIDE	MFUL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.45%	1.46%	-0.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.92%	3.23%	+0.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.43%	3.93%	+0.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.25%	4.24%	+0.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.25%	4.24%	+0.01%

HIDE vs. MFUL - Expense Ratio Comparison

HIDE has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than MFUL's 1.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

HIDE vs. MFUL - Dividend Comparison

HIDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.96%, less than MFUL's 3.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
HIDE Alpha Architect High Inflation And Deflation ETF	2.96%	3.16%	2.86%	3.90%	6.25%
MFUL Mindful Conservative ETF	3.01%	3.31%	2.59%	5.00%	0.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HIDE and MFUL in my portfolio?

HIDE and MFUL have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HIDE or MFUL?

MFUL has higher volatility (1.46%) compared to HIDE (1.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HIDE dropped -5.15% vs MFUL's -16.41%.

Which ETF is better, HIDE or MFUL?

On 3-year performance, MFUL leads with 4.96% vs 4.42% for HIDE. On fees, HIDE is cheaper at 0.29% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HIDE or MFUL?

Over the 3-year period, MFUL has performed better with a 4.96% return vs 4.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HIDE or MFUL?

HIDE is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 1.10% for MFUL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HIDE or MFUL?

MFUL has the higher dividend yield at 3.01%, compared with 2.96% for HIDE.

What is the main difference between HIDE and MFUL?

They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and Mohr Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for HIDE and 1.10% for MFUL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HIDE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.