HIDE vs. INCM
HIDE (Alpha Architect High Inflation And Deflation ETF) and INCM (Franklin Income Focus ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, HIDE returned 10.85% vs 15.73% for INCM. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HIDE charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for INCM.
Performance
HIDE vs. INCM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HIDE achieves a 6.79% return, which is significantly higher than INCM's 6.45% return.
HIDE
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -1.06%
- YTD
- 6.79%
- 6M
- 6.65%
- 1Y
- 10.85%
- 3Y*
- 4.42%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
INCM
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- 0.70%
- YTD
- 6.45%
- 6M
- 6.84%
- 1Y
- 15.73%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HIDE vs. INCM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HIDE Alpha Architect High Inflation And Deflation ETF | 6.79% | 5.32% | -0.85% | 1.87% |
INCM Franklin Income Focus ETF | 6.45% | 13.07% | 6.80% | 5.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between HIDE and INCM is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2023 | 0.47 |
The correlation between HIDE and INCM shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (1 year) to 0.47 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HIDE vs. INCM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HIDE
INCM
Real Estate
Communication Services
Energy
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
HIDE
INCM
Communication Services
HIDE
INCM
Energy
HIDE
INCM
Industrials
HIDE
INCM
Basic Materials
HIDE
-
INCM
Consumer Cyclical
HIDE
-
INCM
Consumer Defensive
HIDE
-
INCM
Financial Services
HIDE
-
INCM
Healthcare
HIDE
-
INCM
Technology
HIDE
-
INCM
Utilities
HIDE
-
INCM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HIDE vs. INCM — Risk / Return Rank
HIDE
INCM
HIDE vs. INCM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect High Inflation And Deflation ETF (HIDE) and Franklin Income Focus ETF (INCM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HIDE | INCM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.57 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.72 | 4.95 | -0.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.36 | 20.86 | -1.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HIDE | INCM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.46 | 3.01 | -0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | 1.51 | -0.60 |
Drawdowns
HIDE vs. INCM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HIDE drawdown since its inception was -5.15%, smaller than the maximum INCM drawdown of -7.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIDE and INCM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HIDE | INCM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.15% | -7.84% | +2.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.31% | -3.19% | +0.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.15% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.73% | -0.75% | -0.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.94% | -1.09% | +0.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.56% | 0.76% | -0.20% |
Volatility
HIDE vs. INCM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Alpha Architect High Inflation And Deflation ETF (HIDE) is 1.45%, while Franklin Income Focus ETF (INCM) has a volatility of 1.66%. This indicates that HIDE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INCM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HIDE | INCM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.45% | 1.66% | -0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.92% | 3.82% | +0.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.43% | 5.25% | -0.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.25% | 7.23% | -2.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.25% | 7.23% | -2.98% |
HIDE vs. INCM - Expense Ratio Comparison
HIDE has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than INCM's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
HIDE vs. INCM - Dividend Comparison
HIDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.96%, less than INCM's 5.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIDE Alpha Architect High Inflation And Deflation ETF | 2.96% | 3.16% | 2.86% | 3.90% | 6.25% |
INCM Franklin Income Focus ETF | 5.08% | 4.96% | 5.06% | 3.01% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HIDE and INCM have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
INCM has higher volatility (1.66%) compared to HIDE (1.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HIDE dropped -5.15% vs INCM's -7.84%.
On 1-year performance, INCM leads with 15.73% vs 10.85% for HIDE. On fees, HIDE is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, HIDE has been the lower-risk option at 1.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, INCM has performed better with a 15.73% return vs 10.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HIDE is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for INCM.
INCM has the higher dividend yield at 5.08%, compared with 2.96% for HIDE.
They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for HIDE and 0.38% for INCM.
INCM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.01 vs 2.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HIDE and INCM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer