HICOX vs. BIL
Compare and contrast key facts about Colorado Bond Shares A Tax Exempt Fund (HICOX) and SPDR Barclays 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL).
HICOX is managed by Freedom Funds. It was launched on Jun 3, 1987. BIL is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Barclays Capital U.S. 1-3 Month Treasury Bill Index. It was launched on May 25, 2007.
Performance
HICOX vs. BIL - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HICOX vs. BIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HICOX Colorado Bond Shares A Tax Exempt Fund | 0.39% | 4.36% | 8.64% | 5.10% | -6.14% | 4.44% | 4.69% | 6.42% | 4.64% | 5.63% |
BIL SPDR Barclays 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 0.85% | 4.15% | 5.19% | 4.94% | 1.40% | -0.10% | 0.40% | 2.03% | 1.74% | 0.69% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HICOX achieves a 0.39% return, which is significantly lower than BIL's 0.85% return. Over the past 10 years, HICOX has outperformed BIL with an annualized return of 4.00%, while BIL has yielded a comparatively lower 2.12% annualized return.
HICOX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.10%
- YTD
- 0.39%
- 6M
- 2.33%
- 1Y
- 5.47%
- 3Y*
- 5.59%
- 5Y*
- 2.89%
- 10Y*
- 4.00%
BIL
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 0.85%
- 6M
- 1.84%
- 1Y
- 3.99%
- 3Y*
- 4.70%
- 5Y*
- 3.27%
- 10Y*
- 2.12%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HICOX vs. BIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
HICOX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than BIL's 0.14% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HICOX vs. BIL — Risk / Return Rank
HICOX
BIL
HICOX vs. BIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Colorado Bond Shares A Tax Exempt Fund (HICOX) and SPDR Barclays 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HICOX | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.30 | 19.52 | -18.21 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.67 | 254.04 | -252.37 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 180.28 | -178.82 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.30 | 365.54 | -364.24 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.29 | 4,104.04 | -4,097.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HICOX | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.30 | 19.52 | -18.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 | 12.54 | -11.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.30 | 8.22 | -6.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.60 | 2.72 | -1.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between HICOX and BIL is 0.01, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
HICOX vs. BIL - Dividend Comparison
HICOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.19%, more than BIL's 4.01% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HICOX Colorado Bond Shares A Tax Exempt Fund | 5.19% | 3.98% | 6.34% | 2.53% | 2.85% | 3.60% | 3.64% | 4.11% | 4.54% | 4.56% | 5.49% | 4.32% |
BIL SPDR Barclays 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 4.01% | 4.13% | 5.03% | 4.92% | 1.35% | 0.00% | 0.30% | 2.05% | 1.66% | 0.68% | 0.07% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
HICOX vs. BIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HICOX drawdown since its inception was -11.00%, which is greater than BIL's maximum drawdown of -0.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HICOX and BIL.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HICOX | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.00% | -0.78% | -10.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.67% | -0.01% | -3.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.66% | -0.12% | -9.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -9.66% | -0.21% | -9.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.10% | 0.00% | -1.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.57% | -0.26% | -2.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.76% | 0.00% | +0.76% |
Volatility
HICOX vs. BIL - Volatility Comparison
Colorado Bond Shares A Tax Exempt Fund (HICOX) has a higher volatility of 0.84% compared to SPDR Barclays 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) at 0.05%. This indicates that HICOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HICOX | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.84% | 0.05% | +0.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.54% | 0.14% | +1.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.32% | 0.21% | +4.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.52% | 0.26% | +3.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.09% | 0.26% | +2.83% |