HIBS vs. TSLZ
HIBS (Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bear 3X Shares) and TSLZ (T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. HIBS is passively managed, while TSLZ is actively managed. Over the past year, HIBS returned -82.21% vs -65.66% for TSLZ. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HIBS charges 1.06%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for TSLZ.
Performance
HIBS vs. TSLZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HIBS achieves a -59.26% return, which is significantly lower than TSLZ's -3.24% return.
HIBS
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- -26.80%
- YTD
- -59.26%
- 6M
- -59.84%
- 1Y
- -82.21%
- 3Y*
- -63.10%
- 5Y*
- -53.41%
- 10Y*
- —
TSLZ
- 1D
- 2.59%
- 1M
- -16.87%
- YTD
- -3.24%
- 6M
- -3.97%
- 1Y
- -65.66%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HIBS vs. TSLZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HIBS Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bear 3X Shares | -59.26% | -72.44% | -26.60% | -47.67% |
TSLZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF | -3.24% | -75.98% | -88.79% | -28.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between HIBS and TSLZ is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2023 | 0.54 |
The correlation between HIBS and TSLZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HIBS vs. TSLZ — Risk / Return Rank
HIBS
TSLZ
HIBS vs. TSLZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bear 3X Shares (HIBS) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HIBS | TSLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.70 | 0.89 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.99 | -0.86 | -0.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.50 | -1.08 | -0.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HIBS | TSLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.22 | -0.72 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.65 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.73 | -0.67 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
HIBS vs. TSLZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HIBS drawdown since its inception was -99.98%, roughly equal to the maximum TSLZ drawdown of -99.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIBS and TSLZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HIBS | TSLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.98% | -99.11% | -0.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -83.13% | -76.62% | -6.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -96.48% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -98.52% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.98% | -98.98% | -1.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -93.14% | -75.39% | -17.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 54.63% | 60.77% | -6.14% |
Volatility
HIBS vs. TSLZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bear 3X Shares (HIBS) is 22.04%, while T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ) has a volatility of 24.24%. This indicates that HIBS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSLZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HIBS | TSLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.04% | 24.24% | -2.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 52.82% | 55.00% | -2.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 67.45% | 91.68% | -24.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 82.46% | 116.96% | -34.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 94.78% | 116.96% | -22.18% |
HIBS vs. TSLZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
HIBS has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than TSLZ's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
HIBS vs. TSLZ - Dividend Comparison
HIBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.62%, more than TSLZ's 0.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIBS Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bear 3X Shares | 11.62% | 8.42% | 5.34% | 6.49% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.92% | 0.13% |
TSLZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF | 0.71% | 0.69% | 2.08% | 12.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HIBS and TSLZ have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSLZ has higher volatility (24.24%) compared to HIBS (22.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HIBS dropped -99.98% vs TSLZ's -99.11%.
On 1-year performance, TSLZ leads with -65.66% vs -82.21% for HIBS. On fees, TSLZ is cheaper at 1.05% per year. On volatility, HIBS has been the lower-risk option at 22.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TSLZ has performed better with a -65.66% return vs -82.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TSLZ is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.06% for HIBS.
HIBS has the higher dividend yield at 11.62%, compared with 0.71% for TSLZ.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and T-Rex. Their fees differ too: 1.06% for HIBS and 1.05% for TSLZ.
TSLZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.72 vs -1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HIBS and TSLZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer