HIBS vs. SEF
HIBS (Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bear 3X Shares) and SEF (ProShares Short Financials) are both Inverse Equities funds - HIBS tracks the S&P 500® High Beta Index while SEF tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index (-100%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HIBS returned -54.75%/yr vs -7.44%/yr for SEF. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HIBS charges 1.06%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SEF.
Performance
HIBS vs. SEF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HIBS achieves a -53.75% return, which is significantly lower than SEF's -1.33% return.
HIBS
- 1D
- 3.90%
- 1M
- 17.68%
- 6M
- -46.29%
- YTD
- -53.75%
- 1Y
- -71.13%
- 3Y*
- -56.50%
- 5Y*
- -54.75%
- 10Y*
- —
SEF
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- -3.84%
- 6M
- -2.14%
- YTD
- -1.33%
- 1Y
- -3.75%
- 3Y*
- -11.46%
- 5Y*
- -7.44%
- 10Y*
- -12.22%
HIBS vs. SEF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIBS Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bear 3X Shares | -53.75% | -72.44% | -26.60% | -62.94% | -7.59% | -75.27% | -91.59% | -17.80% |
SEF ProShares Short Financials | -1.33% | -9.82% | -17.81% | -8.81% | 11.85% | -27.02% | -16.93% | -3.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between HIBS and SEF is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2019 | 0.75 |
Over the past year, the correlation between HIBS and SEF has dropped to 0.43 - well below their long-term average of 0.75, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HIBS vs. SEF — Risk / Return Rank
HIBS
SEF
HIBS vs. SEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bear 3X Shares (HIBS) and ProShares Short Financials (SEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HIBS | SEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | 0.97 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.90 | -0.25 | -0.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.50 | -0.66 | -0.84 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HIBS vs. SEF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HIBS drawdown since its inception was -99.98%, roughly equal to the maximum SEF drawdown of -96.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIBS and SEF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HIBS | SEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.98% | -96.51% | -3.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -79.06% | -14.82% | -64.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -96.91% | -39.40% | -57.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -98.70% | -41.62% | -57.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -73.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.98% | -96.46% | -3.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -93.20% | -82.79% | -10.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 47.41% | 5.72% | +41.69% |
Volatility
HIBS vs. SEF - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bear 3X Shares (HIBS) has a higher volatility of 29.53% compared to ProShares Short Financials (SEF) at 4.13%. This indicates that HIBS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SEF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HIBS | SEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 29.53% | 4.13% | +25.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 64.33% | 11.17% | +53.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 77.64% | 14.53% | +63.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 83.89% | 17.97% | +65.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 95.31% | 20.44% | +74.87% |
HIBS vs. SEF - Expense Ratio Comparison
HIBS has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than SEF's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
HIBS vs. SEF - Dividend Comparison
HIBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.67%, more than SEF's 3.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIBS Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bear 3X Shares | 7.67% | 8.42% | 5.34% | 6.49% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.92% | 0.13% | 0.00% |
SEF ProShares Short Financials | 3.40% | 4.33% | 5.72% | 4.43% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.12% | 1.25% | 0.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HIBS and SEF have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HIBS has higher volatility (29.53%) compared to SEF (4.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HIBS dropped -99.98% vs SEF's -96.51%.
On 5-year performance, SEF leads with -7.44% vs -54.75% for HIBS. On fees, SEF is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, SEF has been the lower-risk option at 4.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SEF has performed better with a -7.44% return vs -54.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SEF is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.06% for HIBS.
HIBS has the higher dividend yield at 7.67%, compared with 3.40% for SEF.
HIBS tracks S&P 500® High Beta Index, while SEF tracks Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index (-100%). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.06% for HIBS and 0.95% for SEF.
SEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.26 vs -0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HIBS and SEF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer