PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HIBS vs. CARD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HIBS vs. CARD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bear 3X Shares (HIBS) and Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (CARD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HIBS achieves a -59.26% return, which is significantly lower than CARD's -3.37% return.


HIBS

1D
0.59%
1M
-26.80%
YTD
-59.26%
6M
-59.84%
1Y
-82.21%
3Y*
-63.10%
5Y*
-53.41%
10Y*

CARD

1D
-0.79%
1M
-13.02%
YTD
-3.37%
6M
-0.02%
1Y
-37.29%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HIBS vs. CARD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
HIBS
Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bear 3X Shares
-59.26%-72.44%-26.60%-27.85%
CARD
Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN
-3.37%-60.21%-58.19%-30.38%

Correlation

The correlation between HIBS and CARD is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2023

0.72

The correlation between HIBS and CARD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HIBS vs. CARD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HIBS
HIBS Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
HIBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIBS Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
HIBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIBS Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

CARD
CARD Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
CARD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CARD Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
CARD Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
CARD Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
CARD Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HIBS vs. CARD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bear 3X Shares (HIBS) and Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (CARD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HIBSCARDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.70

0.95

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.99

-0.75

-0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.50

-1.10

-0.41

HIBS vs. CARD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HIBS Sharpe Ratio is -1.22, which is lower than the CARD Sharpe Ratio of -0.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HIBS and CARD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HIBSCARDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.22

-0.55

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.73

-0.66

-0.07

Drawdowns

HIBS vs. CARD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIBS drawdown since its inception was -99.98%, which is greater than CARD's maximum drawdown of -93.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIBS and CARD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HIBSCARDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.98%

-93.51%

-6.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-83.13%

-49.57%

-33.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-96.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-98.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.98%

-92.74%

-7.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-93.14%

-68.17%

-24.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

54.63%

34.04%

+20.59%

Volatility

HIBS vs. CARD - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bear 3X Shares (HIBS) and Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (CARD) have volatilities of 22.04% and 22.78%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HIBSCARDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.04%

22.78%

-0.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

52.82%

49.82%

+3.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

67.45%

68.57%

-1.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

82.46%

80.47%

+1.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

94.78%

80.47%

+14.31%

HIBS vs. CARD - Expense Ratio Comparison

HIBS has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than CARD's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

HIBS vs. CARD - Dividend Comparison

HIBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.62%, while CARD has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
CARD
Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HIBS
Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bear 3X Shares
11.62%8.42%5.34%6.49%0.04%0.00%0.92%0.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


HIBS and CARD have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CARD has higher volatility (22.78%) compared to HIBS (22.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HIBS dropped -99.98% vs CARD's -93.51%.

On 1-year performance, CARD leads with -37.29% vs -82.21% for HIBS. On fees, CARD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, HIBS has been the lower-risk option at 22.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CARD has performed better with a -37.29% return vs -82.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CARD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.06% for HIBS.

HIBS has the higher dividend yield at 11.62%, compared with 0.00% for CARD.

HIBS tracks S&P 500® High Beta Index, while CARD tracks Prime Auto Industry Index - Benchmark TR Net (--300%). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Max. Their fees differ too: 1.06% for HIBS and 0.95% for CARD.

CARD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.55 vs -1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HIBS and CARD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer