HIBL vs. SPUS
HIBL (Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares) and SPUS (SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HIBL is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 High Beta Index (300%), while SPUS is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Shariah Industry Exclusions Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HIBL returned 11.69%/yr vs 14.72%/yr for SPUS. Their 0.76 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. HIBL charges 1.12%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for SPUS.
Performance
HIBL vs. SPUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HIBL achieves a 51.75% return, which is significantly higher than SPUS's 12.33% return.
HIBL
- 1D
- 7.65%
- 1M
- -11.68%
- 6M
- 34.09%
- YTD
- 51.75%
- 1Y
- 117.87%
- 3Y*
- 40.02%
- 5Y*
- 11.69%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 16.86%
SPUS
- 1D
- 1.49%
- 1M
- 0.95%
- 6M
- 10.92%
- YTD
- 12.33%
- 1Y
- 26.90%
- 3Y*
- 22.08%
- 5Y*
- 14.72%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 18.29%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $5.60M | $5.92M | $6.50M | |
| $26.70M | $22.56M | $27.21M |
HIBL vs. SPUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIBL Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares | 51.75% | 60.38% | -0.40% | 81.02% | -68.24% | 129.14% | -24.96% | 5.33% |
SPUS SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF | 12.33% | 19.77% | 26.49% | 34.24% | -22.76% | 35.92% | 25.68% | 0.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between HIBL and SPUS is 0.84, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2019 | 0.76 |
The correlation between HIBL and SPUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
HIBL vs. SPUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HIBL
SPUS
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Utilities
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Real Estate
-
Technology
HIBL
SPUS
Industrials
HIBL
SPUS
Financial Services
HIBL
SPUS
-
Consumer Cyclical
HIBL
SPUS
Healthcare
HIBL
SPUS
Utilities
HIBL
SPUS
Basic Materials
HIBL
SPUS
Communication Services
HIBL
SPUS
Consumer Defensive
HIBL
SPUS
Energy
HIBL
SPUS
Real Estate
HIBL
-
SPUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HIBL vs. SPUS — Risk / Return Rank
HIBL
SPUS
HIBL vs. SPUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL) and SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HIBL | SPUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.30 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.95 | 2.53 | +0.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.01 | 8.67 | +1.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HIBL vs. SPUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HIBL drawdown since its inception was -88.27%, which is greater than SPUS's maximum drawdown of -30.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIBL and SPUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HIBL | SPUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.27% | -30.80% | -57.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.14% | -10.66% | -29.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -69.66% | -22.82% | -46.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -81.58% | -28.06% | -53.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.29% | -3.84% | -23.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.54% | -6.16% | -37.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.82% | 3.11% | +8.71% |
Volatility
HIBL vs. SPUS - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL) has a higher volatility of 29.17% compared to SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS) at 4.87%. This indicates that HIBL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HIBL | SPUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 29.17% | 4.87% | +24.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 65.64% | 12.88% | +52.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 79.06% | 15.89% | +63.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 83.80% | 19.50% | +64.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 92.56% | 21.26% | +71.30% |
HIBL vs. SPUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
HIBL has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is higher than SPUS's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
HIBL vs. SPUS - Dividend Comparison
HIBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, more than SPUS's 0.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIBL Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares | 1.49% | 2.43% | 0.82% | 0.69% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.19% | 0.19% |
SPUS SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF | 0.53% | 0.60% | 0.70% | 0.87% | 1.21% | 1.15% | 1.04% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HIBL and SPUS have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HIBL has higher volatility (29.17%) compared to SPUS (4.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HIBL dropped -88.27% vs SPUS's -30.80%.
On 5-year performance, SPUS leads with 14.72% vs 11.69% for HIBL. On fees, SPUS is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, SPUS has been the lower-risk option at 4.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPUS has performed better with a 14.72% return vs 11.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPUS is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.12% for HIBL.
HIBL has the higher dividend yield at 1.49%, compared with 0.53% for SPUS.
HIBL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SPUS is S&P 500. HIBL tracks S&P 500 High Beta Index (300%), while SPUS tracks S&P 500 Shariah Industry Exclusions Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and SP Funds. Their fees differ too: 1.12% for HIBL and 0.45% for SPUS.
SPUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HIBL and SPUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer