HIBL vs. BOIL
HIBL (Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares) and BOIL (ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas) are both exchange-traded funds - HIBL is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 High Beta Index (300%), while BOIL is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Bloomberg Natural Gas Subindex. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HIBL returned 11.88%/yr vs -66.38%/yr for BOIL. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HIBL charges 1.12%/yr vs 1.31%/yr for BOIL.
Performance
HIBL vs. BOIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HIBL achieves a 83.10% return, which is significantly higher than BOIL's -41.05% return.
HIBL
- 1D
- -12.27%
- 1M
- 13.78%
- YTD
- 83.10%
- 6M
- 71.60%
- 1Y
- 227.44%
- 3Y*
- 55.36%
- 5Y*
- 11.88%
- 10Y*
- —
BOIL
- 1D
- -4.80%
- 1M
- 5.97%
- YTD
- -41.05%
- 6M
- -46.24%
- 1Y
- -75.60%
- 3Y*
- -66.48%
- 5Y*
- -66.38%
- 10Y*
- -57.84%
HIBL vs. BOIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIBL Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares | 83.10% | 60.38% | -0.40% | 81.02% | -68.24% | 129.14% | -24.96% | 19.23% |
BOIL ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas | -41.05% | -58.98% | -60.75% | -92.00% | -31.85% | 23.84% | -74.74% | -44.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between HIBL and BOIL is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2019 | 0.04 |
The correlation between HIBL and BOIL shifts across timeframes, from -0.24 (1 year) to 0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HIBL vs. BOIL — Risk / Return Rank
HIBL
BOIL
HIBL vs. BOIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL) and ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas (BOIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HIBL | BOIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 0.89 | +0.50 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.29 | -0.98 | +8.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 25.38 | -1.36 | +26.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HIBL vs. BOIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HIBL drawdown since its inception was -88.27%, smaller than the maximum BOIL drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIBL and BOIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HIBL | BOIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.27% | -100.00% | +11.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.39% | -77.43% | +46.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -69.66% | -96.86% | +27.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -81.58% | -99.91% | +18.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -99.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.27% | -100.00% | +87.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.91% | -93.59% | +49.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.01% | 56.83% | -47.82% |
Volatility
HIBL vs. BOIL - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL) has a higher volatility of 36.89% compared to ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas (BOIL) at 23.63%. This indicates that HIBL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BOIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HIBL | BOIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 36.89% | 23.63% | +13.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 59.56% | 104.46% | -44.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 73.15% | 113.44% | -40.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 83.29% | 118.97% | -35.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 92.43% | 101.84% | -9.41% |
HIBL vs. BOIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
HIBL has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is lower than BOIL's 1.31% expense ratio.
Dividends
HIBL vs. BOIL - Dividend Comparison
HIBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, while BOIL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOIL ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HIBL Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares | 1.26% | 2.43% | 0.82% | 0.69% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.19% | 0.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HIBL and BOIL have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HIBL has higher volatility (36.89%) compared to BOIL (23.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HIBL dropped -88.27% vs BOIL's -100.00%.
On 5-year performance, HIBL leads with 11.88% vs -66.38% for BOIL. On fees, HIBL is cheaper at 1.12% per year. On volatility, BOIL has been the lower-risk option at 23.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, HIBL has performed better with a 11.88% return vs -66.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HIBL is cheaper with a 1.12% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for BOIL.
HIBL has the higher dividend yield at 1.26%, compared with 0.00% for BOIL.
HIBL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BOIL is Oil & Gas. HIBL tracks S&P 500 High Beta Index (300%), while BOIL tracks Bloomberg Natural Gas Subindex. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.12% for HIBL and 1.31% for BOIL.
HIBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.13 vs -0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HIBL and BOIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer