PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HIBL vs. BOIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HIBL vs. BOIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL) and ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas (BOIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HIBL achieves a 96.27% return, which is significantly higher than BOIL's -36.77% return.


HIBL

1D
-2.25%
1M
38.56%
YTD
96.27%
6M
98.56%
1Y
279.13%
3Y*
62.03%
5Y*
11.57%
10Y*

BOIL

1D
4.32%
1M
4.62%
YTD
-36.77%
6M
-62.98%
1Y
-74.31%
3Y*
-60.61%
5Y*
-64.63%
10Y*
-56.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HIBL vs. BOIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
HIBL
Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares
96.27%60.38%-0.40%81.02%-68.24%129.14%-24.96%21.45%
BOIL
ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas
-36.77%-58.98%-60.75%-92.00%-31.85%23.84%-74.74%-43.19%

Correlation

The correlation between HIBL and BOIL is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2019

0.04

The correlation between HIBL and BOIL shifts across timeframes, from -0.25 (1 year) to 0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HIBL vs. BOIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HIBL
HIBL Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
HIBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIBL Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
HIBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIBL Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

BOIL
BOIL Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
BOIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOIL Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
BOIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOIL Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HIBL vs. BOIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL) and ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas (BOIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HIBLBOILDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+4.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

0.90

+0.57

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.96

-0.92

+9.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

32.84

-1.26

+34.09

HIBL vs. BOIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HIBL Sharpe Ratio is 4.26, which is higher than the BOIL Sharpe Ratio of -0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HIBL and BOIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HIBLBOILDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.26

-0.66

+4.92

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

-0.55

+0.69

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

-0.61

+0.86

Drawdowns

HIBL vs. BOIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIBL drawdown since its inception was -88.27%, smaller than the maximum BOIL drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIBL and BOIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HIBLBOILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.27%

-100.00%

+11.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.39%

-80.85%

+49.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-69.66%

-96.86%

+27.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-81.58%

-99.91%

+18.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.25%

-100.00%

+97.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.20%

-93.59%

+49.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.55%

59.20%

-50.65%

Volatility

HIBL vs. BOIL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL) is 21.25%, while ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas (BOIL) has a volatility of 23.95%. This indicates that HIBL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BOIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HIBLBOILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.25%

23.95%

-2.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

50.46%

107.61%

-57.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

66.16%

113.64%

-47.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

82.16%

118.89%

-36.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

91.89%

101.81%

-9.92%

HIBL vs. BOIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

HIBL has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is lower than BOIL's 1.31% expense ratio.


Dividends

HIBL vs. BOIL - Dividend Comparison

HIBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, while BOIL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
BOIL
ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HIBL
Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares
1.18%2.43%0.82%0.69%0.00%0.06%0.19%0.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


HIBL and BOIL have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BOIL has higher volatility (23.95%) compared to HIBL (21.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HIBL dropped -88.27% vs BOIL's -100.00%.

On 5-year performance, HIBL leads with 11.57% vs -64.63% for BOIL. On fees, HIBL is cheaper at 1.12% per year. On volatility, HIBL has been the lower-risk option at 21.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, HIBL has performed better with a 11.57% return vs -64.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HIBL is cheaper with a 1.12% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for BOIL.

HIBL has the higher dividend yield at 1.18%, compared with 0.00% for BOIL.

HIBL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BOIL is Leveraged Commodities. HIBL tracks S&P 500 High Beta Index (300%), while BOIL tracks Bloomberg Natural Gas Subindex. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.12% for HIBL and 1.31% for BOIL.

HIBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.26 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HIBL and BOIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer