HIBL vs. INTW

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

HIBL (Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares) and INTW (GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. HIBL is passively managed, while INTW is actively managed. Over the past year, HIBL returned 227.44% vs 1964.55% for INTW. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HIBL charges 1.12%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for INTW.

Performance

HIBL vs. INTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL) and GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HIBL achieves a 83.10% return, which is significantly lower than INTW's 750.22% return.

HIBL

• 1D: -12.27%
• 1M: 13.78%
• YTD: 83.10%
• 6M: 71.60%
• 1Y: 227.44%
• 3Y*: 55.36%
• 5Y*: 11.88%
• 10Y*: —

INTW

• 1D: -12.49%
• 1M: 12.21%
• YTD: 750.22%
• 6M: 775.58%
• 1Y: 1,964.55%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HIBL vs. INTW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HIBL Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares	83.10%	51.06%
INTW GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF	750.22%	60.89%

Correlation

The correlation between HIBL and INTW is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2025	0.52

The correlation between HIBL and INTW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

HIBL vs. INTW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HIBL	INTW
Technology	9.5%	66.7%
Financial Services	2.9%	-
Industrials	2.8%	-
Consumer Cyclical	2.4%	-
Healthcare	1.1%	-
Utilities	0.7%	-
Basic Materials	0.5%	-
Communication Services	0.3%	-
Consumer Defensive	0.2%	-
Energy	0.2%	-
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

HIBL vs. INTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HIBL

HIBL Risk / Return Rank: 84
HIBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
HIBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
HIBL Omega Ratio Rank: 71
HIBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
HIBL Martin Ratio Rank: 94

INTW

INTW Risk / Return Rank: 98
INTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
INTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
INTW Omega Ratio Rank: 94
INTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
INTW Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HIBL vs. INTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL) and GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HIBL	INTW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.13	13.25	-10.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.96	5.13	-2.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.65	-0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.29	40.32	-33.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	25.38	91.49	-66.12

HIBL vs. INTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HIBL Sharpe Ratio is 3.13, which is lower than the INTW Sharpe Ratio of 13.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HIBL and INTW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HIBL vs. INTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIBL drawdown since its inception was -88.27%, which is greater than INTW's maximum drawdown of -60.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIBL and INTW.

Drawdown Indicators

	HIBL	INTW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-88.27%	-60.58%	-27.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.39%	-49.34%	+17.95%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-69.66%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-81.58%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.27%	-12.49%	+0.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-43.91%	-29.66%	-14.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.01%	21.70%	-12.69%

Volatility

HIBL vs. INTW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL) is 36.89%, while GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW) has a volatility of 55.81%. This indicates that HIBL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HIBL	INTW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	36.89%	55.81%	-18.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	59.56%	119.10%	-59.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	73.15%	150.14%	-76.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	83.29%	148.88%	-65.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	92.43%	148.88%	-56.45%

HIBL vs. INTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

HIBL has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is lower than INTW's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

HIBL vs. INTW - Dividend Comparison

HIBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, while INTW has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
HIBL Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares	1.26%	2.43%	0.82%	0.69%	0.00%	0.06%	0.19%	0.19%
INTW GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HIBL and INTW in my portfolio?

HIBL and INTW have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HIBL or INTW?

INTW has higher volatility (55.81%) compared to HIBL (36.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HIBL dropped -88.27% vs INTW's -60.58%.

Which ETF is better, HIBL or INTW?

On 1-year performance, INTW leads with 1964.55% vs 227.44% for HIBL. On fees, HIBL is cheaper at 1.12% per year. On volatility, HIBL has been the lower-risk option at 36.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HIBL or INTW?

Over the 1-year period, INTW has performed better with a 1964.55% return vs 227.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HIBL or INTW?

HIBL is cheaper with a 1.12% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for INTW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HIBL or INTW?

HIBL has the higher dividend yield at 1.26%, compared with 0.00% for INTW.

What is the main difference between HIBL and INTW?

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 1.12% for HIBL and 1.50% for INTW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

INTW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (13.25 vs 3.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.