PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HIBL vs. IFED
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HIBL vs. IFED - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL) and ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HIBL vs. IFED - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
HIBL
Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares
-6.14%60.38%-0.40%81.02%-68.24%14.68%
IFED
ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN
-10.58%15.02%23.04%20.78%-1.46%8.46%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HIBL achieves a -6.14% return, which is significantly higher than IFED's -10.58% return.


HIBL

1D
3.15%
1M
-15.20%
YTD
-6.14%
6M
2.41%
1Y
133.35%
3Y*
27.73%
5Y*
1.55%
10Y*

IFED

1D
0.13%
1M
-5.40%
YTD
-10.58%
6M
-10.82%
1Y
5.31%
3Y*
14.88%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HIBL vs. IFED - Expense Ratio Comparison

HIBL has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is higher than IFED's 0.45% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

HIBL vs. IFED — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HIBL
HIBL Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
HIBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIBL Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
HIBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIBL Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

IFED
IFED Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
IFED Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IFED Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
IFED Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
IFED Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
IFED Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HIBL vs. IFED - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL) and ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HIBLIFEDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.49

0.28

+1.20

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.13

0.51

+1.62

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.07

+0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.12

0.38

+2.74

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.78

1.18

+10.60

HIBL vs. IFED - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HIBL Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is higher than the IFED Sharpe Ratio of 0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HIBL and IFED, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HIBLIFEDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.49

0.28

+1.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.10

0.58

-0.48

Correlation

The correlation between HIBL and IFED is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

HIBL vs. IFED - Dividend Comparison

HIBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%, while IFED has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
HIBL
Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares
2.46%2.43%0.82%0.69%0.00%0.06%0.19%0.19%
IFED
ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

HIBL vs. IFED - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIBL drawdown since its inception was -88.27%, which is greater than IFED's maximum drawdown of -22.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIBL and IFED.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


HIBLIFEDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.27%

-22.36%

-65.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-44.08%

-14.65%

-29.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-81.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.76%

-12.41%

-14.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-45.22%

-5.71%

-39.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.69%

4.70%

+6.99%

Volatility

HIBL vs. IFED - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL) has a higher volatility of 25.93% compared to ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED) at 4.93%. This indicates that HIBL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IFED based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


HIBLIFEDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.93%

4.93%

+21.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

53.24%

10.82%

+42.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

90.33%

18.80%

+71.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

81.88%

19.71%

+62.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

92.41%

19.71%

+72.70%