HIBL vs. CBRG
HIBL (Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares) and CBRG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CBRS Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. HIBL is passively managed, while CBRG is actively managed. Their 0.08 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. HIBL charges 1.12%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CBRG.
Performance
HIBL vs. CBRG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
HIBL
- 1D
- 7.65%
- 1M
- -11.68%
- 6M
- 34.09%
- YTD
- 51.75%
- 1Y
- 117.87%
- 3Y*
- 40.02%
- 5Y*
- 11.69%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 16.86%
CBRG
- 1D
- 21.49%
- 1M
- -0.81%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $53.40M | $44.52M | $39.90M | |
| $5.60M | $5.92M | $6.50M |
HIBL vs. CBRG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
HIBL Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares | 51.66% |
CBRG Leverage Shares 2X Long CBRS Daily ETF | -57.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between HIBL and CBRG is 0.08, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2026 | 0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HIBL vs. CBRG — Risk / Return Rank
HIBL
CBRG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
HIBL vs. CBRG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CBRS Daily ETF (CBRG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HIBL | CBRG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.95 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.01 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HIBL vs. CBRG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HIBL drawdown since its inception was -88.27%, which is greater than CBRG's maximum drawdown of -78.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIBL and CBRG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HIBL | CBRG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.27% | -78.35% | -9.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -69.66% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -81.58% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.29% | -65.00% | +37.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.54% | -24.96% | -18.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.82% | — | — |
Volatility
HIBL vs. CBRG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HIBL | CBRG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 29.17% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 65.64% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 79.06% | 178.34% | -99.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 83.80% | 178.34% | -94.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 92.56% | 178.34% | -85.78% |
HIBL vs. CBRG - Expense Ratio Comparison
HIBL has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is higher than CBRG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
HIBL vs. CBRG - Dividend Comparison
HIBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, while CBRG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBRG Leverage Shares 2X Long CBRS Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HIBL Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares | 1.49% | 2.43% | 0.82% | 0.69% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.19% | 0.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HIBL and CBRG have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CBRG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CBRG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.12% for HIBL.
HIBL has the higher dividend yield at 1.49%, compared with 0.00% for CBRG.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.12% for HIBL and 0.75% for CBRG.
Find the right allocation for HIBL and CBRG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer