HIASX vs. WMKSX

Last updated Jun 27, 2026

HIASX (Hartford Small Company HLS Fund) and WMKSX (WesMark Small Company Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, HIASX returned 13.61%/yr vs 14.81%/yr for WMKSX. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HIASX charges 0.77%/yr vs 1.24%/yr for WMKSX.

Performance

HIASX vs. WMKSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Small Company HLS Fund (HIASX) and WesMark Small Company Fund (WMKSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HIASX achieves a 16.00% return, which is significantly lower than WMKSX's 23.70% return. Over the past 10 years, HIASX has underperformed WMKSX with an annualized return of 13.61%, while WMKSX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.81% annualized return.

HIASX

• 1D: 1.14%
• 1M: 5.33%
• YTD: 16.00%
• 6M: 13.88%
• 1Y: 32.90%
• 3Y*: 17.20%
• 5Y*: 2.41%
• 10Y*: 13.61%

WMKSX

• 1D: 1.46%
• 1M: 6.99%
• YTD: 23.70%
• 6M: 21.05%
• 1Y: 36.72%
• 3Y*: 26.53%
• 5Y*: 11.68%
• 10Y*: 14.81%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HIASX vs. WMKSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HIASX Hartford Small Company HLS Fund	16.00%	12.95%	12.00%	16.74%	-31.56%	1.88%	55.51%	36.72%	-4.21%	26.36%
WMKSX WesMark Small Company Fund	23.70%	16.19%	22.12%	19.42%	-20.72%	22.81%	36.78%	20.32%	-13.92%	13.21%

Correlation

The correlation between HIASX and WMKSX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 1996	0.84

The correlation between HIASX and WMKSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

HIASX vs. WMKSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HIASX

HIASX Risk / Return Rank: 57
HIASX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
HIASX Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
HIASX Omega Ratio Rank: 50
HIASX Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
HIASX Martin Ratio Rank: 59

WMKSX

WMKSX Risk / Return Rank: 80
WMKSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
WMKSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
WMKSX Omega Ratio Rank: 65
WMKSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
WMKSX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HIASX vs. WMKSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Small Company HLS Fund (HIASX) and WesMark Small Company Fund (WMKSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HIASX	WMKSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.87	2.17	-0.30
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.64	3.00	-0.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.36	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.53	4.57	-2.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.94	15.31	-5.37

HIASX vs. WMKSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HIASX Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is comparable to the WMKSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HIASX and WMKSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HIASX vs. WMKSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIASX drawdown since its inception was -68.04%, which is greater than WMKSX's maximum drawdown of -64.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIASX and WMKSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	HIASX	WMKSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-68.04%	-64.09%	-3.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.84%	-8.50%	-5.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.87%	-24.20%	-2.67%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.94%	-39.84%	-1.10%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.36%	-39.84%	-2.52%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.34%	-15.65%	-5.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.52%	2.53%	+0.99%

Volatility

HIASX vs. WMKSX - Volatility Comparison

Hartford Small Company HLS Fund (HIASX) has a higher volatility of 6.82% compared to WesMark Small Company Fund (WMKSX) at 4.77%. This indicates that HIASX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WMKSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HIASX	WMKSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.82%	4.77%	+2.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.36%	12.42%	+1.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.87%	17.95%	+0.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.22%	26.14%	-2.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.44%	23.95%	-0.51%

HIASX vs. WMKSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HIASX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is lower than WMKSX's 1.24% expense ratio.

Dividends

HIASX vs. WMKSX - Dividend Comparison

HIASX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, less than WMKSX's 18.52% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HIASX Hartford Small Company HLS Fund	0.34%	0.40%	0.00%	0.00%	26.96%	13.78%	12.10%	20.73%	8.06%	0.00%	10.42%	0.00%
WMKSX WesMark Small Company Fund	18.52%	22.91%	4.69%	5.93%	6.23%	25.75%	8.21%	0.00%	12.53%	8.59%	5.26%	6.57%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HIASX and WMKSX in my portfolio?

HIASX and WMKSX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HIASX or WMKSX?

HIASX has higher volatility (6.82%) compared to WMKSX (4.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HIASX dropped -68.04% vs WMKSX's -64.09%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WMKSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.