PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HIASX vs. HIABX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HIASX vs. HIABX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Small Company HLS Fund (HIASX) and Hartford Total Return Bond HLS Fund (HIABX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HIASX achieves a 10.08% return, which is significantly higher than HIABX's 0.42% return. Over the past 10 years, HIASX has outperformed HIABX with an annualized return of 12.03%, while HIABX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.30% annualized return.


HIASX

1D
1.01%
1M
2.14%
YTD
10.08%
6M
8.29%
1Y
28.62%
3Y*
15.57%
5Y*
2.51%
10Y*
12.03%

HIABX

1D
0.21%
1M
-0.10%
YTD
0.42%
6M
0.63%
1Y
5.39%
3Y*
4.72%
5Y*
0.40%
10Y*
1.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HIASX vs. HIABX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HIASX
Hartford Small Company HLS Fund
10.08%12.95%12.00%16.74%-31.56%1.88%55.51%36.72%-4.21%26.36%
HIABX
Hartford Total Return Bond HLS Fund
0.42%7.29%2.34%6.97%-14.21%-0.94%4.95%10.66%-4.70%5.16%

Correlation

The correlation between HIASX and HIABX is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 12, 1996

-0.09

The correlation between HIASX and HIABX shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (all time) to 0.29 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HIASX vs. HIABX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HIASX
HIASX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
HIASX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIASX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIASX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
HIASX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIASX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

HIABX
HIABX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
HIABX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIABX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIABX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
HIABX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIABX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HIASX vs. HIABX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Small Company HLS Fund (HIASX) and Hartford Total Return Bond HLS Fund (HIABX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HIASXHIABXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.24

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.09

1.88

+0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.26

5.73

+2.53

HIASX vs. HIABX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HIASX Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is comparable to the HIABX Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HIASX and HIABX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HIASXHIABXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.60

1.35

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

0.07

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.25

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.10

0.03

+0.07

Drawdowns

HIASX vs. HIABX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIASX drawdown since its inception was -68.04%, smaller than the maximum HIABX drawdown of -91.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIASX and HIABX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HIASXHIABXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.04%

-91.15%

+23.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.84%

-2.77%

-11.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.87%

-6.53%

-20.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.94%

-19.40%

-21.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.36%

-21.48%

-20.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.77%

-2.56%

+1.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.38%

-24.49%

+3.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.49%

0.91%

+2.58%

Volatility

HIASX vs. HIABX - Volatility Comparison

Hartford Small Company HLS Fund (HIASX) has a higher volatility of 5.20% compared to Hartford Total Return Bond HLS Fund (HIABX) at 1.41%. This indicates that HIASX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HIABX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HIASXHIABXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.20%

1.41%

+3.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.33%

2.81%

+10.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.01%

3.91%

+14.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.09%

5.90%

+17.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.42%

5.32%

+18.10%

HIASX vs. HIABX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HIASX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than HIABX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

HIASX vs. HIABX - Dividend Comparison

HIASX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than HIABX's 5.56% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
HIABX
Hartford Total Return Bond HLS Fund
5.56%5.59%3.71%3.42%4.63%5.14%0.23%3.96%0.37%3.00%0.40%
HIASX
Hartford Small Company HLS Fund
0.36%0.40%0.00%0.00%26.96%13.78%12.10%20.73%8.06%0.00%10.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


HIASX and HIABX have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HIASX has higher volatility (5.20%) compared to HIABX (1.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HIASX dropped -68.04% vs HIABX's -91.15%.

HIASX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HIASX and HIABX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer