PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HIASX vs. NBGIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HIASX vs. NBGIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Small Company HLS Fund (HIASX) and Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund Institutional Class (NBGIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HIASX achieves a 10.08% return, which is significantly higher than NBGIX's 6.73% return. Over the past 10 years, HIASX has outperformed NBGIX with an annualized return of 12.03%, while NBGIX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.09% annualized return.


HIASX

1D
1.01%
1M
2.14%
YTD
10.08%
6M
8.29%
1Y
28.62%
3Y*
15.57%
5Y*
2.51%
10Y*
12.03%

NBGIX

1D
0.68%
1M
-0.66%
YTD
6.73%
6M
4.70%
1Y
7.84%
3Y*
6.97%
5Y*
2.68%
10Y*
9.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HIASX vs. NBGIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HIASX
Hartford Small Company HLS Fund
10.08%12.95%12.00%16.74%-31.56%1.88%55.51%36.72%-4.21%26.36%
NBGIX
Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund Institutional Class
6.73%-4.55%9.20%15.73%-19.35%18.25%25.07%29.68%-6.76%16.02%

Correlation

The correlation between HIASX and NBGIX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 1999

0.90

The correlation between HIASX and NBGIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (1 year) to 0.90 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HIASX vs. NBGIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HIASX
HIASX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
HIASX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIASX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIASX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
HIASX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIASX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

NBGIX
NBGIX Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
NBGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NBGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
NBGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
NBGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
NBGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HIASX vs. NBGIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Small Company HLS Fund (HIASX) and Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund Institutional Class (NBGIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HIASXNBGIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.09

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.09

0.74

+1.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.26

1.98

+6.28

HIASX vs. NBGIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HIASX Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is higher than the NBGIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HIASX and NBGIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HIASXNBGIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.60

0.50

+1.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

0.14

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.45

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.10

0.54

-0.44

Drawdowns

HIASX vs. NBGIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIASX drawdown since its inception was -68.04%, which is greater than NBGIX's maximum drawdown of -51.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIASX and NBGIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HIASXNBGIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.04%

-51.62%

-16.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.84%

-10.75%

-3.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.87%

-27.48%

+0.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.94%

-28.27%

-12.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.36%

-34.53%

-7.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.77%

-8.95%

+8.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.38%

-7.47%

-13.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.49%

3.99%

-0.50%

Volatility

HIASX vs. NBGIX - Volatility Comparison

Hartford Small Company HLS Fund (HIASX) has a higher volatility of 5.20% compared to Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund Institutional Class (NBGIX) at 3.98%. This indicates that HIASX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NBGIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HIASXNBGIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.20%

3.98%

+1.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.33%

11.33%

+2.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.01%

16.00%

+2.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.09%

19.66%

+3.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.42%

20.22%

+3.20%

HIASX vs. NBGIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HIASX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is lower than NBGIX's 0.84% expense ratio.


Dividends

HIASX vs. NBGIX - Dividend Comparison

HIASX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than NBGIX's 15.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HIASX
Hartford Small Company HLS Fund
0.36%0.40%0.00%0.00%26.96%13.78%12.10%20.73%8.06%0.00%10.42%0.00%
NBGIX
Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund Institutional Class
15.38%16.41%2.14%3.13%11.11%10.91%3.87%6.00%12.49%14.10%6.53%11.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


HIASX and NBGIX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HIASX has higher volatility (5.20%) compared to NBGIX (3.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HIASX dropped -68.04% vs NBGIX's -51.62%.

HIASX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HIASX and NBGIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer