HIACX vs. FLVCX
HIACX (Hartford Capital Appreciation HLS Fund) and FLVCX (Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, HIACX returned 13.06%/yr vs 16.53%/yr for FLVCX. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HIACX charges 0.67%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for FLVCX.
Performance
HIACX vs. FLVCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HIACX achieves a 7.01% return, which is significantly lower than FLVCX's 26.99% return. Over the past 10 years, HIACX has underperformed FLVCX with an annualized return of 13.06%, while FLVCX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.53% annualized return.
HIACX
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 0.04%
- YTD
- 7.01%
- 6M
- 5.99%
- 1Y
- 21.58%
- 3Y*
- 17.32%
- 5Y*
- 9.49%
- 10Y*
- 13.06%
FLVCX
- 1D
- 1.44%
- 1M
- 9.26%
- YTD
- 26.99%
- 6M
- 25.31%
- 1Y
- 44.76%
- 3Y*
- 29.79%
- 5Y*
- 15.32%
- 10Y*
- 16.53%
HIACX vs. FLVCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIACX Hartford Capital Appreciation HLS Fund | 7.01% | 13.68% | 21.26% | 20.01% | -15.73% | 14.85% | 21.82% | 31.00% | -7.15% | 22.13% |
FLVCX Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock Fund | 26.99% | 20.34% | 26.95% | 26.10% | -22.99% | 26.08% | 26.74% | 35.60% | -16.43% | 20.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between HIACX and FLVCX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2000 | 0.91 |
The correlation between HIACX and FLVCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HIACX vs. FLVCX — Risk / Return Rank
HIACX
FLVCX
HIACX vs. FLVCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Capital Appreciation HLS Fund (HIACX) and Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock Fund (FLVCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HIACX | FLVCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.36 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.16 | 3.56 | -1.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.84 | 12.93 | -4.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HIACX vs. FLVCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HIACX drawdown since its inception was -92.74%, which is greater than FLVCX's maximum drawdown of -70.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIACX and FLVCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HIACX | FLVCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.74% | -70.02% | -22.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.56% | -13.06% | +2.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.15% | -28.54% | +9.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.19% | -28.54% | +3.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.33% | -44.14% | +8.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.84% | 0.00% | -1.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.51% | -10.98% | -13.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.57% | 3.59% | -1.02% |
Volatility
HIACX vs. FLVCX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hartford Capital Appreciation HLS Fund (HIACX) is 4.70%, while Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock Fund (FLVCX) has a volatility of 9.08%. This indicates that HIACX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLVCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HIACX | FLVCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.70% | 9.08% | -4.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.84% | 18.05% | -8.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.59% | 22.29% | -9.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.80% | 23.07% | -6.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.88% | 23.51% | -5.63% |
HIACX vs. FLVCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HIACX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is lower than FLVCX's 0.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
HIACX vs. FLVCX - Dividend Comparison
HIACX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.11%, more than FLVCX's 3.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLVCX Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock Fund | 3.72% | 4.72% | 14.53% | 12.19% | 18.49% | 8.40% | 0.11% | 0.10% | 19.91% | 18.96% | 27.48% | 6.18% |
HIACX Hartford Capital Appreciation HLS Fund | 12.11% | 12.96% | 4.89% | 2.43% | 16.98% | 9.56% | 7.62% | 12.43% | 13.46% | 6.53% | 11.26% | 24.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HIACX and FLVCX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLVCX has higher volatility (9.08%) compared to HIACX (4.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HIACX dropped -92.74% vs FLVCX's -70.02%.
FLVCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HIACX and FLVCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer