HHL.TO vs. XDNA.TO
HHL.TO (Harvest Healthcare Leaders Income ETF) and XDNA.TO (iShares Genomics Immunology and Healthcare Index ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. HHL.TO is actively managed, while XDNA.TO is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, HHL.TO returned 3.74%/yr vs 7.28%/yr for XDNA.TO. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HHL.TO charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.44%/yr for XDNA.TO.
Performance
HHL.TO vs. XDNA.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HHL.TO achieves a -8.20% return, which is significantly lower than XDNA.TO's 10.45% return.
HHL.TO
- 1D
- 1.04%
- 1M
- 0.43%
- YTD
- -8.20%
- 6M
- -8.09%
- 1Y
- 4.65%
- 3Y*
- 3.74%
- 5Y*
- 5.39%
- 10Y*
- 6.53%
XDNA.TO
- 1D
- -1.95%
- 1M
- -1.11%
- YTD
- 10.45%
- 6M
- 9.39%
- 1Y
- 40.18%
- 3Y*
- 7.28%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HHL.TO vs. XDNA.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HHL.TO Harvest Healthcare Leaders Income ETF | -8.20% | 10.47% | 3.87% | 6.74% | 4.18% |
XDNA.TO iShares Genomics Immunology and Healthcare Index ETF | 10.45% | 12.10% | 5.54% | -7.84% | -13.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between HHL.TO and XDNA.TO is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2022 | 0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HHL.TO vs. XDNA.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HHL.TO
XDNA.TO
HHL.TO vs. XDNA.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Healthcare Leaders Income ETF (HHL.TO) and iShares Genomics Immunology and Healthcare Index ETF (XDNA.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HHL.TO | XDNA.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.30 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.36 | 4.67 | -4.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.90 | 10.95 | -10.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HHL.TO | XDNA.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 | 1.65 | -1.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.04 | +0.29 |
Drawdowns
HHL.TO vs. XDNA.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HHL.TO drawdown since its inception was -26.70%, smaller than the maximum XDNA.TO drawdown of -45.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HHL.TO and XDNA.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HHL.TO | XDNA.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.70% | -45.90% | +19.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.88% | -8.64% | -4.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.01% | -28.29% | +12.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.01% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.20% | -8.95% | -2.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.23% | -23.55% | +17.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.18% | 3.68% | +1.50% |
Volatility
HHL.TO vs. XDNA.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Harvest Healthcare Leaders Income ETF (HHL.TO) is 5.49%, while iShares Genomics Immunology and Healthcare Index ETF (XDNA.TO) has a volatility of 6.47%. This indicates that HHL.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDNA.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HHL.TO | XDNA.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.49% | 6.47% | -0.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.11% | 18.03% | -7.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.40% | 24.71% | -10.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.11% | 25.32% | -11.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.79% | 25.32% | -9.53% |
HHL.TO vs. XDNA.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HHL.TO has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than XDNA.TO's 0.44% expense ratio.
Dividends
HHL.TO vs. XDNA.TO - Dividend Comparison
HHL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.64%, more than XDNA.TO's 0.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HHL.TO Harvest Healthcare Leaders Income ETF | 10.64% | 9.36% | 9.27% | 8.71% | 8.51% | 7.91% | 9.02% | 8.65% | 9.00% | 8.45% | 8.83% | 8.19% |
XDNA.TO iShares Genomics Immunology and Healthcare Index ETF | 0.39% | 0.43% | 0.32% | 0.25% | 0.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HHL.TO and XDNA.TO have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDNA.TO is cheaper at 0.44% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDNA.TO is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for HHL.TO.
They also come from different issuers: Harvest and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for HHL.TO and 0.44% for XDNA.TO.
Find the right allocation for HHL.TO and XDNA.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer