PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HHIH.TO vs. CNQE.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HHIH.TO vs. CNQE.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Harvest High Income Equity Shares ETF Class A Units (HHIH.TO) and Harvest CNQ Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (CNQE.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HHIH.TO achieves a 7.81% return, which is significantly lower than CNQE.TO's 39.35% return.


HHIH.TO

1D
-0.86%
1M
6.32%
YTD
7.81%
6M
3.37%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CNQE.TO

1D
1.83%
1M
3.29%
YTD
39.35%
6M
37.15%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HHIH.TO vs. CNQE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between HHIH.TO and CNQE.TO is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2025

-0.21

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HHIH.TO vs. CNQE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest High Income Equity Shares ETF Class A Units (HHIH.TO) and Harvest CNQ Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (CNQE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

HHIH.TO vs. CNQE.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HHIH.TOCNQE.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.89

2.48

-1.59

Drawdowns

HHIH.TO vs. CNQE.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HHIH.TO drawdown since its inception was -19.68%, which is greater than CNQE.TO's maximum drawdown of -18.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HHIH.TO and CNQE.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HHIH.TOCNQE.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.68%

-18.22%

-1.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.05%

-6.08%

+4.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.87%

-4.12%

-2.75%

Volatility

HHIH.TO vs. CNQE.TO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HHIH.TOCNQE.TODifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.75%

33.12%

-12.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.75%

33.12%

-12.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.75%

33.12%

-12.37%

HHIH.TO vs. CNQE.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both HHIH.TO and CNQE.TO have an expense ratio of 0.40%.


Dividends

HHIH.TO vs. CNQE.TO - Dividend Comparison

HHIH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.50%, more than CNQE.TO's 9.40% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


HHIH.TO and CNQE.TO have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.40% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HHIH.TO and CNQE.TO have the same expense ratio: 0.40% per year.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HHIH.TO and CNQE.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer