HGY.TO vs. HYLD
HGY.TO (Global X Gold Yield ETF) and HYLD (High Yield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HGY.TO is a Gold fund actively managed by Global X, while HYLD is a High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by Eve Capital. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.14, they often move in opposite directions. HGY.TO charges 0.86%/yr vs 1.29%/yr for HYLD.
Performance
HGY.TO vs. HYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
HGY.TO is traded in CAD, while HYLD is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the HYLD values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
HGY.TO
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- -1.36%
- YTD
- 1.16%
- 6M
- 3.23%
- 1Y
- 23.98%
- 3Y*
- 24.16%
- 5Y*
- 13.84%
- 10Y*
- 9.42%
HYLD
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HGY.TO vs. HYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HGY.TO Global X Gold Yield ETF | 1.16% | 48.66% | 21.36% | 9.51% | -1.07% | -4.51% | 18.67% | 13.62% | -3.58% | 8.33% |
HYLD High Yield ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.28% | -5.17% | 4.46% | 1.37% | 1.89% | 8.75% | 2.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between HGY.TO and HYLD is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 21, 2010 | -0.14 |
The correlation between HGY.TO and HYLD shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (all time) to 0.02 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HGY.TO vs. HYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HGY.TO
HYLD
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
HGY.TO
HYLD
Basic Materials
HGY.TO
-
HYLD
Communication Services
HGY.TO
-
HYLD
Consumer Cyclical
HGY.TO
-
HYLD
Consumer Defensive
HGY.TO
-
HYLD
Energy
HGY.TO
-
HYLD
Healthcare
HGY.TO
-
HYLD
Industrials
HGY.TO
-
HYLD
Real Estate
HGY.TO
-
HYLD
Technology
HGY.TO
-
HYLD
Utilities
HGY.TO
-
HYLD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HGY.TO vs. HYLD — Risk / Return Rank
HGY.TO
HYLD
HGY.TO vs. HYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Gold Yield ETF (HGY.TO) and High Yield ETF (HYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HGY.TO | HYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.38 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.70 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HGY.TO | HYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.03 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.07 | — | — |
Drawdowns
HGY.TO vs. HYLD - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HGY.TO | HYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.53% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.47% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.47% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.32% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.54% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.79% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.50% | — | — |
Volatility
HGY.TO vs. HYLD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HGY.TO | HYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.22% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.71% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.45% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.57% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.45% | — | — |
HGY.TO vs. HYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
HGY.TO has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is lower than HYLD's 1.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
HGY.TO vs. HYLD - Dividend Comparison
HGY.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.13%, while HYLD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HGY.TO Global X Gold Yield ETF | 6.13% | 4.92% | 5.32% | 6.10% | 6.42% | 5.87% | 5.72% | 4.19% | 4.66% | 4.63% | 5.37% | 6.13% |
HYLD High Yield ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.67% | 7.86% | 6.45% | 7.52% | 7.46% | 7.97% | 7.18% | 6.59% | 10.87% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HGY.TO and HYLD have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HGY.TO is cheaper at 0.86% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HGY.TO is cheaper with a 0.86% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for HYLD.
HGY.TO is categorized as Gold, while HYLD is High Yield Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Eve Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.86% for HGY.TO and 1.29% for HYLD.
Find the right allocation for HGY.TO and HYLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer