PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HGXIX vs. TAVFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HGXIX vs. TAVFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Global Impact Fund (HGXIX) and Third Avenue Value Fund (TAVFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HGXIX achieves a 14.43% return, which is significantly lower than TAVFX's 16.28% return.


HGXIX

1D
0.95%
1M
7.81%
YTD
14.43%
6M
14.77%
1Y
17.14%
3Y*
13.62%
5Y*
4.14%
10Y*

TAVFX

1D
0.80%
1M
4.80%
YTD
16.28%
6M
18.09%
1Y
44.22%
3Y*
19.67%
5Y*
14.77%
10Y*
10.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HGXIX vs. TAVFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HGXIX
Hartford Global Impact Fund
14.43%9.62%7.78%13.19%-22.53%10.86%31.37%27.97%-10.10%23.00%
TAVFX
Third Avenue Value Fund
16.28%35.93%-2.43%20.26%17.46%22.39%7.76%12.95%-25.95%3.35%

Correlation

The correlation between HGXIX and TAVFX is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2017

0.67

The correlation between HGXIX and TAVFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HGXIX vs. TAVFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HGXIX
HGXIX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
HGXIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HGXIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
HGXIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
HGXIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
HGXIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

TAVFX
TAVFX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
TAVFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TAVFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
TAVFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
TAVFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
TAVFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HGXIX vs. TAVFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Global Impact Fund (HGXIX) and Third Avenue Value Fund (TAVFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HGXIXTAVFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.51

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.66

3.95

-2.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.04

16.13

-11.09

HGXIX vs. TAVFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HGXIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is lower than the TAVFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HGXIX and TAVFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HGXIXTAVFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.25

2.96

-1.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

0.18

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.30

+0.28

Drawdowns

HGXIX vs. TAVFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HGXIX drawdown since its inception was -36.01%, smaller than the maximum TAVFX drawdown of -66.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HGXIX and TAVFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HGXIXTAVFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.01%

-66.11%

+30.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.61%

-11.48%

+0.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.74%

-66.11%

+50.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.08%

-66.11%

+34.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.91%

-9.57%

+0.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.48%

2.80%

+0.68%

Volatility

HGXIX vs. TAVFX - Volatility Comparison

Hartford Global Impact Fund (HGXIX) has a higher volatility of 4.58% compared to Third Avenue Value Fund (TAVFX) at 3.76%. This indicates that HGXIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TAVFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HGXIXTAVFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.58%

3.76%

+0.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.25%

10.77%

+0.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.05%

15.29%

-1.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.60%

81.99%

-65.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.40%

60.31%

-42.91%

HGXIX vs. TAVFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HGXIX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than TAVFX's 1.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

HGXIX vs. TAVFX - Dividend Comparison

HGXIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, less than TAVFX's 5.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HGXIX
Hartford Global Impact Fund
0.47%0.54%0.00%0.97%0.78%2.85%0.69%0.71%14.85%4.04%0.00%0.00%
TAVFX
Third Avenue Value Fund
5.96%6.93%9.86%4.48%5.67%3.74%0.70%5.95%4.45%3.03%8.24%8.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


HGXIX and TAVFX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HGXIX has higher volatility (4.58%) compared to TAVFX (3.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HGXIX dropped -36.01% vs TAVFX's -66.11%.

TAVFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.96 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HGXIX and TAVFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer