PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HGXIX vs. RTXAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HGXIX vs. RTXAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Global Impact Fund (HGXIX) and Russell Investment Tax-Managed Real Assets Fund (RTXAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HGXIX vs. RTXAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
HGXIX
Hartford Global Impact Fund
-4.00%9.62%7.78%13.19%-22.53%10.86%31.37%10.56%
RTXAX
Russell Investment Tax-Managed Real Assets Fund
11.49%13.56%1.50%7.40%-11.66%26.57%3.73%6.17%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HGXIX achieves a -4.00% return, which is significantly lower than RTXAX's 11.49% return.


HGXIX

1D
-0.68%
1M
-9.90%
YTD
-4.00%
6M
-6.82%
1Y
5.93%
3Y*
7.33%
5Y*
1.85%
10Y*

RTXAX

1D
0.13%
1M
-2.88%
YTD
11.49%
6M
14.38%
1Y
24.85%
3Y*
10.58%
5Y*
7.43%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HGXIX vs. RTXAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HGXIX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than RTXAX's 1.33% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

HGXIX vs. RTXAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HGXIX
HGXIX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
HGXIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HGXIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
HGXIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
HGXIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
HGXIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

RTXAX
RTXAX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
RTXAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RTXAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
RTXAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
RTXAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
RTXAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HGXIX vs. RTXAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Global Impact Fund (HGXIX) and Russell Investment Tax-Managed Real Assets Fund (RTXAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HGXIXRTXAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.36

1.69

-1.33

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.61

2.24

-1.63

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.35

-0.26

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.43

1.89

-1.46

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.28

10.79

-9.50

HGXIX vs. RTXAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HGXIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.36, which is lower than the RTXAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HGXIX and RTXAX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HGXIXRTXAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

1.69

-1.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

0.47

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.40

+0.07

Correlation

The correlation between HGXIX and RTXAX is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

HGXIX vs. RTXAX - Dividend Comparison

HGXIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than RTXAX's 2.57% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
HGXIX
Hartford Global Impact Fund
0.56%0.54%0.00%0.97%0.78%2.85%0.69%0.71%14.85%4.04%
RTXAX
Russell Investment Tax-Managed Real Assets Fund
2.57%2.86%2.05%1.98%3.11%1.74%1.71%0.84%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

HGXIX vs. RTXAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HGXIX drawdown since its inception was -36.01%, smaller than the maximum RTXAX drawdown of -40.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HGXIX and RTXAX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


HGXIXRTXAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.01%

-40.68%

+4.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.67%

-13.11%

+2.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.08%

-24.63%

-7.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.61%

-3.32%

-7.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.04%

-7.96%

-1.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.55%

2.29%

+1.26%

Volatility

HGXIX vs. RTXAX - Volatility Comparison

Hartford Global Impact Fund (HGXIX) has a higher volatility of 5.51% compared to Russell Investment Tax-Managed Real Assets Fund (RTXAX) at 4.12%. This indicates that HGXIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RTXAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


HGXIXRTXAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.51%

4.12%

+1.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.99%

8.24%

+1.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.53%

15.04%

+1.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.39%

15.85%

+0.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.37%

20.26%

-2.89%