HGER vs. QTUM

Last updated Jul 21, 2026

HGER (Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF) and QTUM (Defiance Quantum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HGER is a Commodities fund tracking the Quantix Commodity Index - Benchmark TR Net, while QTUM is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, HGER returned 19.08%/yr vs 41.66%/yr for QTUM. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HGER charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for QTUM.

Performance

HGER vs. QTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF (HGER) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with HGER having a 28.53% return and QTUM slightly higher at 29.22%.

HGER

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 6.65%
• 6M: 24.03%
• YTD: 28.53%
• 1Y: 37.92%
• 3Y*: 19.08%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 15.35%

QTUM

• 1D: -0.36%
• 1M: -15.81%
• 6M: 19.65%
• YTD: 29.22%
• 1Y: 50.12%
• 3Y*: 41.66%
• 5Y*: 24.90%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 25.72%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HGER vs. QTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
HGER Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF	28.53%	20.08%	9.25%	1.93%	9.66%
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF	29.22%	36.65%	50.54%	39.86%	-23.85%

Correlation

The correlation between HGER and QTUM is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.06
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2022	0.15

Return for Risk

HGER vs. QTUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HGER

HGER Risk / Return Rank: 80
HGER Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
HGER Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
HGER Omega Ratio Rank: 86
HGER Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
HGER Martin Ratio Rank: 72

QTUM

QTUM Risk / Return Rank: 69
QTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
QTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
QTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 60
QTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
QTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HGER vs. QTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF (HGER) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HGER	QTUM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.17	1.65	+0.52
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.90	2.18	+0.72
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.28	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.71	3.11	-0.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.68	10.12	-0.44

HGER vs. QTUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HGER Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is higher than the QTUM Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HGER and QTUM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HGER vs. QTUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HGER drawdown since its inception was -23.31%, smaller than the maximum QTUM drawdown of -38.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HGER and QTUM.

Drawdown Indicators

	HGER	QTUM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.31%	-38.45%	+15.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.04%	-16.20%	+2.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.04%	-25.39%	+11.35%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-38.45%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.69%	-16.20%	+11.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.69%	-8.23%	+0.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.93%	4.97%	-1.04%

Volatility

HGER vs. QTUM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF (HGER) is 6.11%, while Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) has a volatility of 10.67%. This indicates that HGER experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HGER	QTUM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.11%	10.67%	-4.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.51%	25.32%	-9.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.57%	30.60%	-13.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.68%	27.46%	-9.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.68%	27.58%	-9.90%

HGER vs. QTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

HGER has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than QTUM's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

HGER vs. QTUM - Dividend Comparison

HGER's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.51%, more than QTUM's 0.83% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
HGER Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF	5.51%	7.09%	3.28%	7.24%	0.64%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF	0.83%	1.01%	0.61%	0.81%	1.46%	0.48%	0.42%	0.61%	0.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HGER and QTUM in my portfolio?

HGER and QTUM have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HGER or QTUM?

QTUM has higher volatility (10.67%) compared to HGER (6.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HGER dropped -23.31% vs QTUM's -38.45%.

Which ETF is better, HGER or QTUM?

On 3-year performance, QTUM leads with 41.66% vs 19.08% for HGER. On fees, QTUM is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, HGER has been the lower-risk option at 6.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HGER or QTUM?

Over the 3-year period, QTUM has performed better with a 41.66% return vs 19.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HGER or QTUM?

QTUM is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for HGER.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HGER or QTUM?

HGER has the higher dividend yield at 5.51%, compared with 0.83% for QTUM.

What is the main difference between HGER and QTUM?

HGER is categorized as Commodities, while QTUM is Technology Equities. HGER tracks Quantix Commodity Index - Benchmark TR Net, while QTUM tracks BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. They also come from different issuers: Harbor and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for HGER and 0.40% for QTUM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HGER currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.