PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HGER vs. LSEQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HGER vs. LSEQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF (HGER) and Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF (LSEQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with HGER having a 28.12% return and LSEQ slightly lower at 27.40%.


HGER

1D
-0.28%
1M
-2.72%
YTD
28.12%
6M
27.93%
1Y
41.90%
3Y*
21.26%
5Y*
10Y*

LSEQ

1D
1.12%
1M
4.34%
YTD
27.40%
6M
26.84%
1Y
25.44%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HGER vs. LSEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
HGER
Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF
28.12%20.08%9.25%0.20%
LSEQ
Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF
27.40%4.13%12.80%-1.20%

Correlation

The correlation between HGER and LSEQ is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2023

0.13

HGER vs. LSEQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HGER
LSEQ

Basic Materials

102.4%
27.3%

Communication Services

-

7.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

17.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

5.2%

Energy

-

15.0%

Financial Services

-

1.2%

Healthcare

-

14.7%

Industrials

-

6.5%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-10.9%

Utilities

-

3.1%

Basic Materials

HGER
102.4%
LSEQ
27.3%

Communication Services

HGER

-

LSEQ
7.0%

Consumer Cyclical

HGER

-

LSEQ
17.3%

Consumer Defensive

HGER

-

LSEQ
5.2%

Energy

HGER

-

LSEQ
15.0%

Financial Services

HGER

-

LSEQ
1.2%

Healthcare

HGER

-

LSEQ
14.7%

Industrials

HGER

-

LSEQ
6.5%

Real Estate

HGER

-

LSEQ

-

Technology

HGER

-

LSEQ
-10.9%

Utilities

HGER

-

LSEQ
3.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HGER vs. LSEQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HGER
HGER Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
HGER Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HGER Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
HGER Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
HGER Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
HGER Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

LSEQ
LSEQ Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
LSEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
LSEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HGER vs. LSEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF (HGER) and Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF (LSEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HGERLSEQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.31

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.20

3.45

+1.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.52

9.40

+8.11

HGER vs. LSEQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HGER Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is higher than the LSEQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HGER and LSEQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HGERLSEQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.50

1.70

+0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

1.19

-0.29

Drawdowns

HGER vs. LSEQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HGER drawdown since its inception was -23.31%, which is greater than LSEQ's maximum drawdown of -8.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HGER and LSEQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HGERLSEQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.31%

-8.35%

-14.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.09%

-7.40%

-0.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.99%

-1.66%

-3.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.66%

-3.23%

-4.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.40%

2.78%

-0.38%

Volatility

HGER vs. LSEQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF (HGER) is 4.02%, while Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF (LSEQ) has a volatility of 5.48%. This indicates that HGER experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSEQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HGERLSEQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.02%

5.48%

-1.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.54%

12.75%

+1.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.87%

15.09%

+1.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.62%

14.32%

+3.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.62%

14.32%

+3.30%

HGER vs. LSEQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

HGER has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than LSEQ's 1.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

HGER vs. LSEQ - Dividend Comparison

HGER's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.53%, more than LSEQ's 1.73% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
HGER
Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF
5.53%7.09%3.28%7.24%0.64%
LSEQ
Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF
1.73%2.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HGER and LSEQ have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LSEQ has higher volatility (5.48%) compared to HGER (4.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HGER dropped -23.31% vs LSEQ's -8.35%.

On 1-year performance, HGER leads with 41.90% vs 25.44% for LSEQ. On fees, HGER is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, HGER has been the lower-risk option at 4.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, HGER has performed better with a 41.90% return vs 25.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HGER is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 1.70% for LSEQ.

HGER has the higher dividend yield at 5.53%, compared with 1.73% for LSEQ.

HGER is categorized as Commodities, while LSEQ is Long-Short. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for HGER and 1.70% for LSEQ.

HGER currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HGER and LSEQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer