HGER vs. HYEM
HGER (Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF) and HYEM (VanEck Vectors Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HGER is a Commodities fund tracking the Quantix Commodity Index - Benchmark TR Net, while HYEM is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the BofA Merrill Lynch Diversified High Yield US Emerging Markets Corporate Plus Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, HGER returned 19.99%/yr vs 10.72%/yr for HYEM. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HGER charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for HYEM.
Performance
HGER vs. HYEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HGER achieves a 24.74% return, which is significantly higher than HYEM's 3.71% return.
HGER
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- -4.74%
- YTD
- 24.74%
- 6M
- 24.88%
- 1Y
- 37.35%
- 3Y*
- 19.99%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HYEM
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- YTD
- 3.71%
- 6M
- 4.40%
- 1Y
- 9.80%
- 3Y*
- 10.72%
- 5Y*
- 2.93%
- 10Y*
- 4.61%
HGER vs. HYEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HGER Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF | 24.74% | 20.08% | 9.25% | 1.93% | 9.77% |
HYEM VanEck Vectors Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF | 3.71% | 9.24% | 12.14% | 8.35% | -10.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between HGER and HYEM is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2022 | 0.11 |
The correlation between HGER and HYEM shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.11 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HGER vs. HYEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HGER
HYEM
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Basic Materials
HGER
HYEM
-
Communication Services
HGER
-
HYEM
-
Consumer Cyclical
HGER
-
HYEM
-
Consumer Defensive
HGER
-
HYEM
-
Energy
HGER
-
HYEM
-
Financial Services
HGER
-
HYEM
-
Healthcare
HGER
-
HYEM
-
Industrials
HGER
-
HYEM
Real Estate
HGER
-
HYEM
-
Technology
HGER
-
HYEM
-
Utilities
HGER
-
HYEM
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HGER vs. HYEM — Risk / Return Rank
HGER
HYEM
HGER vs. HYEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF (HGER) and VanEck Vectors Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF (HYEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HGER | HYEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.45 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.64 | 3.61 | +1.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.85 | 14.72 | +0.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HGER | HYEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.20 | 2.27 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.39 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 0.54 | +0.32 |
Drawdowns
HGER vs. HYEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HGER drawdown since its inception was -23.31%, smaller than the maximum HYEM drawdown of -30.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HGER and HYEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HGER | HYEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.31% | -30.96% | +7.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.09% | -2.73% | -5.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.84% | -5.23% | -3.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.50% | -0.30% | -7.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.65% | -4.40% | -3.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.52% | 0.67% | +1.85% |
Volatility
HGER vs. HYEM - Volatility Comparison
Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF (HGER) has a higher volatility of 4.49% compared to VanEck Vectors Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF (HYEM) at 1.16%. This indicates that HGER's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HGER | HYEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.49% | 1.16% | +3.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.77% | 3.14% | +11.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.09% | 4.33% | +12.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.64% | 7.49% | +10.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.64% | 9.27% | +8.37% |
HGER vs. HYEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
HGER has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than HYEM's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
HGER vs. HYEM - Dividend Comparison
HGER's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.68%, less than HYEM's 6.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HGER Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF | 5.68% | 7.09% | 3.28% | 7.24% | 0.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HYEM VanEck Vectors Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF | 6.53% | 6.67% | 6.34% | 6.27% | 6.47% | 5.33% | 5.56% | 6.14% | 5.71% | 5.86% | 6.25% | 7.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HGER and HYEM have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HGER has higher volatility (4.49%) compared to HYEM (1.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HGER dropped -23.31% vs HYEM's -30.96%.
On 3-year performance, HGER leads with 19.99% vs 10.72% for HYEM. On fees, HYEM is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, HYEM has been the lower-risk option at 1.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, HGER has performed better with a 19.99% return vs 10.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HYEM is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for HGER.
HYEM has the higher dividend yield at 6.53%, compared with 5.68% for HGER.
HGER is categorized as Commodities, while HYEM is High Yield Bonds. HGER tracks Quantix Commodity Index - Benchmark TR Net, while HYEM tracks BofA Merrill Lynch Diversified High Yield US Emerging Markets Corporate Plus Index. They also come from different issuers: Harbor and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for HGER and 0.40% for HYEM.
HYEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HGER and HYEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer