HGER vs. FAAR
HGER (Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF) and FAAR (First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF) are both Commodities funds. HGER is passively managed, while FAAR is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, HGER returned 21.26%/yr vs 11.79%/yr for FAAR. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HGER charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for FAAR.
Performance
HGER vs. FAAR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HGER achieves a 28.12% return, which is significantly higher than FAAR's 25.73% return.
HGER
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- -2.72%
- YTD
- 28.12%
- 6M
- 27.93%
- 1Y
- 41.90%
- 3Y*
- 21.26%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FAAR
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- -0.79%
- YTD
- 25.73%
- 6M
- 23.17%
- 1Y
- 40.73%
- 3Y*
- 11.79%
- 5Y*
- 8.07%
- 10Y*
- 5.17%
HGER vs. FAAR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HGER Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF | 28.12% | 20.08% | 9.25% | 1.93% | 9.77% |
FAAR First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF | 25.73% | 8.07% | 5.97% | -5.63% | 1.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between HGER and FAAR is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2022 | 0.51 |
The correlation between HGER and FAAR shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (all time) to 0.67 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HGER vs. FAAR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HGER
FAAR
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Basic Materials
HGER
FAAR
-
Communication Services
HGER
-
FAAR
-
Consumer Cyclical
HGER
-
FAAR
-
Consumer Defensive
HGER
-
FAAR
-
Energy
HGER
-
FAAR
-
Financial Services
HGER
-
FAAR
Healthcare
HGER
-
FAAR
-
Industrials
HGER
-
FAAR
-
Real Estate
HGER
-
FAAR
-
Technology
HGER
-
FAAR
-
Utilities
HGER
-
FAAR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HGER vs. FAAR — Risk / Return Rank
HGER
FAAR
HGER vs. FAAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF (HGER) and First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HGER | FAAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.52 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.20 | 8.44 | -3.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.52 | 23.64 | -6.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HGER | FAAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.50 | 3.04 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.62 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.45 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | 0.45 | +0.45 |
Drawdowns
HGER vs. FAAR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HGER drawdown since its inception was -23.31%, which is greater than FAAR's maximum drawdown of -18.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HGER and FAAR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HGER | FAAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.31% | -18.03% | -5.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.09% | -4.85% | -3.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.84% | -11.54% | +2.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -18.03% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.99% | -1.11% | -3.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.66% | -7.85% | +0.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.40% | 1.73% | +0.67% |
Volatility
HGER vs. FAAR - Volatility Comparison
Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF (HGER) has a higher volatility of 4.02% compared to First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR) at 2.44%. This indicates that HGER's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HGER | FAAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.02% | 2.44% | +1.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.54% | 9.72% | +4.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.87% | 13.48% | +3.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.62% | 13.02% | +4.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.62% | 11.51% | +6.11% |
HGER vs. FAAR - Expense Ratio Comparison
HGER has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than FAAR's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
HGER vs. FAAR - Dividend Comparison
HGER's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.53%, less than FAAR's 9.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAAR First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF | 9.15% | 11.63% | 3.45% | 3.20% | 5.82% | 6.49% | 3.05% | 1.02% | 0.58% | 2.83% |
HGER Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF | 5.53% | 7.09% | 3.28% | 7.24% | 0.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HGER and FAAR have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HGER has higher volatility (4.02%) compared to FAAR (2.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HGER dropped -23.31% vs FAAR's -18.03%.
On 3-year performance, HGER leads with 21.26% vs 11.79% for FAAR. On fees, HGER is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, FAAR has been the lower-risk option at 2.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, HGER has performed better with a 21.26% return vs 11.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HGER is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FAAR.
FAAR has the higher dividend yield at 9.15%, compared with 5.53% for HGER.
They also come from different issuers: Harbor and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for HGER and 0.95% for FAAR.
FAAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.04 vs 2.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HGER and FAAR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer