PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HGER vs. CMDT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HGER vs. CMDT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF (HGER) and PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund (CMDT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HGER vs. CMDT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
HGER
Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF
24.94%20.08%9.25%3.41%
CMDT
PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund
16.96%12.78%6.93%5.50%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HGER achieves a 24.94% return, which is significantly higher than CMDT's 16.96% return.


HGER

1D
0.16%
1M
9.58%
YTD
24.94%
6M
28.72%
1Y
38.09%
3Y*
18.44%
5Y*
10Y*

CMDT

1D
-0.74%
1M
8.58%
YTD
16.96%
6M
19.62%
1Y
24.37%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HGER vs. CMDT - Expense Ratio Comparison

HGER has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than CMDT's 0.65% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

HGER vs. CMDT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HGER
HGER Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
HGER Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HGER Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
HGER Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
HGER Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
HGER Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

CMDT
CMDT Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
CMDT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMDT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMDT Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
CMDT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMDT Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HGER vs. CMDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF (HGER) and PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund (CMDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HGERCMDTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.12

1.85

+0.27

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.79

2.50

+0.29

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.34

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.51

2.72

+1.79

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.96

10.00

+5.96

HGER vs. CMDT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HGER Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the CMDT Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HGER and CMDT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HGERCMDTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12

1.85

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.89

1.22

-0.33

Correlation

The correlation between HGER and CMDT is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

HGER vs. CMDT - Dividend Comparison

HGER's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.67%, more than CMDT's 2.60% yield.


TTM2025202420232022
HGER
Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF
5.67%7.09%3.28%7.24%0.64%
CMDT
PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund
2.60%3.04%8.80%2.71%0.00%

Drawdowns

HGER vs. CMDT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HGER drawdown since its inception was -23.31%, which is greater than CMDT's maximum drawdown of -9.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HGER and CMDT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


HGERCMDTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.31%

-9.69%

-13.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.84%

-9.21%

+0.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.61%

-0.74%

+0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.91%

-2.79%

-5.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.50%

2.51%

-0.01%

Volatility

HGER vs. CMDT - Volatility Comparison

Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF (HGER) has a higher volatility of 7.42% compared to PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund (CMDT) at 5.26%. This indicates that HGER's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMDT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


HGERCMDTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.42%

5.26%

+2.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.60%

9.59%

+5.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.10%

13.23%

+4.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.79%

12.13%

+5.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.79%

12.13%

+5.66%