HG vs. SILJ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HG (Hamilton Insurance Group Ltd.) is a stock, while SILJ (Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF) is Silver fund tracking the Nasdaq Junior Silver Miners Index. Over the past year, HG returned 39.96% vs 111.95% for SILJ. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

HG vs. SILJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hamilton Insurance Group Ltd. (HG) and Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HG achieves a 10.46% return, which is significantly higher than SILJ's 6.61% return.

HG

• 1D: 0.59%
• 1M: -4.03%
• YTD: 10.46%
• 6M: 17.40%
• 1Y: 39.96%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SILJ

• 1D: -5.24%
• 1M: 2.57%
• YTD: 6.61%
• 6M: 16.40%
• 1Y: 111.95%
• 3Y*: 47.77%
• 5Y*: 13.13%
• 10Y*: 10.08%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HG vs. SILJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
HG Hamilton Insurance Group Ltd.	10.46%	46.61%	27.29%	-0.33%
SILJ Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF	6.61%	183.89%	6.39%	24.70%

Correlation

The correlation between HG and SILJ is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2023	0.06

Return for Risk

HG vs. SILJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HG

HG Risk / Return Rank: 80
HG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
HG Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
HG Omega Ratio Rank: 73
HG Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
HG Martin Ratio Rank: 88

SILJ

SILJ Risk / Return Rank: 54
SILJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
SILJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
SILJ Omega Ratio Rank: 51
SILJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
SILJ Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HG vs. SILJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton Insurance Group Ltd. (HG) and Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HG	SILJ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.44	2.05	-0.61
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.12	2.35	-0.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.32	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.16	3.24	-0.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.80	7.99	+2.81
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HG vs. SILJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HG Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the SILJ Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HG and SILJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HG	SILJ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.44	2.05	-0.61
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.30	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.22	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.05	0.09	+0.96

Drawdowns

HG vs. SILJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HG drawdown since its inception was -21.07%, smaller than the maximum SILJ drawdown of -79.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HG and SILJ.

Drawdown Indicators

	HG	SILJ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.07%	-79.04%	+57.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.69%	-34.71%	+22.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-34.71%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-55.47%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-70.06%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.17%	-26.80%	+14.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.42%	-41.43%	+36.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.71%	14.06%	-10.35%

Volatility

HG vs. SILJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hamilton Insurance Group Ltd. (HG) is 7.28%, while Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) has a volatility of 18.69%. This indicates that HG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SILJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HG	SILJ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.28%	18.69%	-11.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.03%	45.24%	-27.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.97%	54.90%	-26.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.39%	44.35%	-12.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.39%	46.24%	-14.85%

Dividends

HG vs. SILJ - Dividend Comparison

HG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.94%, more than SILJ's 1.88% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HG Hamilton Insurance Group Ltd.	6.94%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SILJ Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF	1.88%	2.00%	7.26%	0.01%	0.05%	0.36%	1.23%	1.45%	1.66%	0.00%	0.52%	2.46%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HG and SILJ in my portfolio?

HG and SILJ have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HG or SILJ?

SILJ has higher volatility (18.69%) compared to HG (7.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HG dropped -21.07% vs SILJ's -79.04%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SILJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.