PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HFXI vs. UTES
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HFXI vs. UTES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IQ 50 Percent Hedged FTSE International ETF (HFXI) and Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HFXI achieves a 17.13% return, which is significantly higher than UTES's 0.08% return. Over the past 10 years, HFXI has underperformed UTES with an annualized return of 11.47%, while UTES has yielded a comparatively higher 12.40% annualized return.


HFXI

1D
-0.45%
1M
7.03%
YTD
17.13%
6M
20.26%
1Y
35.26%
3Y*
20.46%
5Y*
12.14%
10Y*
11.47%

UTES

1D
-0.98%
1M
-6.58%
YTD
0.08%
6M
-1.81%
1Y
7.86%
3Y*
22.78%
5Y*
15.66%
10Y*
12.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HFXI vs. UTES - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HFXI
IQ 50 Percent Hedged FTSE International ETF
17.13%30.10%7.58%19.56%-10.71%13.96%6.88%23.67%-12.69%22.68%
UTES
Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF
0.08%25.71%45.35%-2.46%0.80%20.74%-0.30%25.48%5.14%14.21%

Correlation

The correlation between HFXI and UTES is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2015

0.31

HFXI vs. UTES - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HFXI
UTES

Financial Services

22.8%

-

Industrials

20.1%

-

Technology

14.5%

-

Healthcare

9.5%

-

Consumer Cyclical

7.7%

-

Consumer Defensive

6.3%

-

Basic Materials

5.9%

-

Energy

3.6%

-

Utilities

3.6%
100.0%

Communication Services

3.5%

-

Real Estate

2.5%

-

Financial Services

HFXI
22.8%
UTES

-

Industrials

HFXI
20.1%
UTES

-

Technology

HFXI
14.5%
UTES

-

Healthcare

HFXI
9.5%
UTES

-

Consumer Cyclical

HFXI
7.7%
UTES

-

Consumer Defensive

HFXI
6.3%
UTES

-

Basic Materials

HFXI
5.9%
UTES

-

Energy

HFXI
3.6%
UTES

-

Utilities

HFXI
3.6%
UTES
100.0%

Communication Services

HFXI
3.5%
UTES

-

Real Estate

HFXI
2.5%
UTES

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HFXI vs. UTES — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HFXI
HFXI Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
HFXI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HFXI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
HFXI Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
HFXI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
HFXI Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

UTES
UTES Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
UTES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTES Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTES Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
UTES Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTES Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HFXI vs. UTES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IQ 50 Percent Hedged FTSE International ETF (HFXI) and Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HFXIUTESDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.08

+0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.27

0.57

+2.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.97

1.30

+11.68

HFXI vs. UTES - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HFXI Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is higher than the UTES Sharpe Ratio of 0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HFXI and UTES, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HFXIUTESDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.41

0.37

+2.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

0.76

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

0.62

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.70

-0.13

Drawdowns

HFXI vs. UTES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HFXI drawdown since its inception was -32.42%, smaller than the maximum UTES drawdown of -35.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFXI and UTES.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HFXIUTESDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.42%

-35.39%

+2.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.84%

-13.88%

+3.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.52%

-17.62%

+4.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.35%

-20.40%

-1.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.42%

-35.39%

+2.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.45%

-9.26%

+8.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.46%

-5.52%

+0.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.72%

6.08%

-3.36%

Volatility

HFXI vs. UTES - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for IQ 50 Percent Hedged FTSE International ETF (HFXI) is 5.46%, while Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES) has a volatility of 7.40%. This indicates that HFXI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UTES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HFXIUTESDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.46%

7.40%

-1.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.40%

16.95%

-4.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.69%

21.27%

-6.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.85%

20.60%

-5.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.63%

20.16%

-3.53%

HFXI vs. UTES - Expense Ratio Comparison

HFXI has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than UTES's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

HFXI vs. UTES - Dividend Comparison

HFXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.84%, more than UTES's 1.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HFXI
IQ 50 Percent Hedged FTSE International ETF
3.84%4.19%2.68%2.49%4.65%3.10%2.00%3.19%4.33%2.56%2.71%0.78%
UTES
Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF
1.50%1.42%1.51%2.44%2.13%1.94%2.09%1.84%2.09%3.44%3.53%0.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


HFXI and UTES have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UTES has higher volatility (7.40%) compared to HFXI (5.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HFXI dropped -32.42% vs UTES's -35.39%.

On 10-year performance, UTES leads with 12.40% vs 11.47% for HFXI. On fees, HFXI is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, HFXI has been the lower-risk option at 5.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, UTES has performed better with a 12.40% return vs 11.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HFXI is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for UTES.

HFXI has the higher dividend yield at 3.84%, compared with 1.50% for UTES.

HFXI is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while UTES is Utilities Equities. They also come from different issuers: New York Life and Virtus Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for HFXI and 0.49% for UTES.

HFXI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HFXI and UTES

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer