HFXI vs. UTES
HFXI (IQ 50 Percent Hedged FTSE International ETF) and UTES (Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HFXI is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed ex North America 50% Hedged to USD Index, while UTES is a Utilities Equities fund actively managed by Virtus Investment Partners. HFXI is passively managed, while UTES is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, HFXI returned 12.02%/yr vs 12.79%/yr for UTES. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HFXI charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for UTES.
Performance
HFXI vs. UTES - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HFXI achieves a 16.65% return, which is significantly higher than UTES's 5.57% return. Over the past 10 years, HFXI has underperformed UTES with an annualized return of 12.02%, while UTES has yielded a comparatively higher 12.79% annualized return.
HFXI
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 1.96%
- YTD
- 16.65%
- 6M
- 16.58%
- 1Y
- 33.60%
- 3Y*
- 20.56%
- 5Y*
- 12.14%
- 10Y*
- 12.02%
UTES
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- 1.78%
- YTD
- 5.57%
- 6M
- 4.73%
- 1Y
- 11.62%
- 3Y*
- 24.74%
- 5Y*
- 17.12%
- 10Y*
- 12.79%
HFXI vs. UTES - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HFXI IQ 50 Percent Hedged FTSE International ETF | 16.65% | 30.10% | 7.58% | 19.56% | -10.71% | 13.96% | 6.88% | 23.67% | -12.69% | 22.68% |
UTES Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF | 5.57% | 25.71% | 45.35% | -2.46% | 0.80% | 20.74% | -0.30% | 25.48% | 5.14% | 14.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between HFXI and UTES is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2015 | 0.31 |
HFXI vs. UTES - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HFXI
UTES
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Utilities
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
HFXI
UTES
-
Industrials
HFXI
UTES
-
Technology
HFXI
UTES
-
Healthcare
HFXI
UTES
-
Consumer Cyclical
HFXI
UTES
-
Consumer Defensive
HFXI
UTES
-
Basic Materials
HFXI
UTES
-
Energy
HFXI
UTES
-
Utilities
HFXI
UTES
Communication Services
HFXI
UTES
-
Real Estate
HFXI
UTES
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HFXI vs. UTES — Risk / Return Rank
HFXI
UTES
HFXI vs. UTES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IQ 50 Percent Hedged FTSE International ETF (HFXI) and Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HFXI | UTES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.11 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.11 | 0.84 | +2.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.17 | 1.83 | +10.34 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HFXI vs. UTES - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HFXI drawdown since its inception was -32.42%, smaller than the maximum UTES drawdown of -35.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFXI and UTES.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HFXI | UTES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.42% | -35.39% | +2.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.84% | -13.88% | +3.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.52% | -17.62% | +4.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.35% | -20.40% | -1.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.42% | -35.39% | +2.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.92% | -4.29% | +1.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.44% | -5.53% | +0.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.77% | 6.36% | -3.59% |
Volatility
HFXI vs. UTES - Volatility Comparison
IQ 50 Percent Hedged FTSE International ETF (HFXI) has a higher volatility of 7.21% compared to Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES) at 6.48%. This indicates that HFXI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UTES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HFXI | UTES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.21% | 6.48% | +0.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.05% | 16.71% | -2.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.00% | 21.44% | -5.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.12% | 20.64% | -5.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.57% | 20.20% | -3.63% |
HFXI vs. UTES - Expense Ratio Comparison
HFXI has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than UTES's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
HFXI vs. UTES - Dividend Comparison
HFXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.32%, more than UTES's 1.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HFXI IQ 50 Percent Hedged FTSE International ETF | 3.32% | 4.19% | 2.68% | 2.49% | 4.65% | 3.10% | 2.00% | 3.19% | 4.33% | 2.56% | 2.71% | 0.78% |
UTES Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF | 1.44% | 1.42% | 1.51% | 2.44% | 2.13% | 1.94% | 2.09% | 1.84% | 2.09% | 3.44% | 3.53% | 0.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HFXI and UTES have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HFXI has higher volatility (7.21%) compared to UTES (6.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HFXI dropped -32.42% vs UTES's -35.39%.
On 10-year performance, UTES leads with 12.79% vs 12.02% for HFXI. On fees, HFXI is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, UTES has been the lower-risk option at 6.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, UTES has performed better with a 12.79% return vs 12.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HFXI is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for UTES.
HFXI has the higher dividend yield at 3.32%, compared with 1.44% for UTES.
HFXI is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while UTES is Utilities Equities. They also come from different issuers: New York Life and Virtus Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for HFXI and 0.49% for UTES.
HFXI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HFXI and UTES
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer