HFSP vs. JHMU

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

HFSP (TradersAI Large Cap Equity & Cash ETF) and JHMU (John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HFSP is a Long-Short fund actively managed by Tidal, while JHMU is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the John Hancock Dimensional Utilities Index. HFSP is actively managed, while JHMU is passively managed. Over the past year, HFSP returned -26.61% vs 5.17% for JHMU. Their -0.03 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. HFSP charges 1.25%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for JHMU.

Performance

HFSP vs. JHMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TradersAI Large Cap Equity & Cash ETF (HFSP) and John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF (JHMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HFSP achieves a -13.00% return, which is significantly lower than JHMU's 0.71% return.

HFSP

• 1D: -2.86%
• 1M: -4.16%
• 6M: -13.42%
• YTD: -13.00%
• 1Y: -26.61%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -20.56%

JHMU

• 1D: -0.25%
• 1M: -1.62%
• 6M: -0.43%
• YTD: 0.71%
• 1Y: 5.17%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 6.30%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
HFSP TradersAI Large Cap Equity & Cash ETF	$263.78	$441.47	$507.97
JHMU John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF	$309.57K	$193.82K	$130.22K

HFSP vs. JHMU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
HFSP TradersAI Large Cap Equity & Cash ETF	-13.00%	-24.01%	0.75%
JHMU John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF	0.71%	5.03%	0.36%

Correlation

The correlation between HFSP and JHMU is -0.11, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2024	-0.03

Return for Risk

HFSP vs. JHMU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HFSP

HFSP Risk / Return Rank: 0
HFSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
HFSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
HFSP Omega Ratio Rank: 0
HFSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
HFSP Martin Ratio Rank: 0

JHMU

JHMU Risk / Return Rank: 75
JHMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
JHMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
JHMU Omega Ratio Rank: 87
JHMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
JHMU Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HFSP vs. JHMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TradersAI Large Cap Equity & Cash ETF (HFSP) and John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF (JHMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HFSP	JHMU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.48	1.97	-3.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.97	2.86	-4.83
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.75	1.39	-0.65
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.92	2.09	-3.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.52	6.95	-8.46

HFSP vs. JHMU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HFSP Sharpe Ratio is -1.48, which is lower than the JHMU Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HFSP and JHMU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HFSP vs. JHMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HFSP drawdown since its inception was -37.30%, which is greater than JHMU's maximum drawdown of -4.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFSP and JHMU.

Drawdown Indicators

	HFSP	JHMU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.30%	-4.48%	-32.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.62%	-2.77%	-25.85%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-37.30%	-1.76%	-35.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.61%	-0.83%	-17.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.31%	0.83%	+16.48%

Volatility

HFSP vs. JHMU - Volatility Comparison

TradersAI Large Cap Equity & Cash ETF (HFSP) has a higher volatility of 4.87% compared to John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF (JHMU) at 0.90%. This indicates that HFSP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JHMU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HFSP	JHMU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.87%	0.90%	+3.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.41%	2.31%	+10.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.81%	2.94%	+14.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.00%	4.06%	+19.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.00%	4.06%	+19.94%

HFSP vs. JHMU - Expense Ratio Comparison

HFSP has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than JHMU's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

HFSP vs. JHMU - Dividend Comparison

HFSP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JHMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.86%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
HFSP TradersAI Large Cap Equity & Cash ETF	0.00%	0.00%	1.53%	0.00%
JHMU John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF	3.86%	4.36%	7.29%	0.63%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HFSP and JHMU in my portfolio?

HFSP and JHMU have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HFSP or JHMU?

HFSP has higher volatility (4.87%) compared to JHMU (0.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HFSP dropped -37.30% vs JHMU's -4.48%.

Which ETF is better, HFSP or JHMU?

On 1-year performance, JHMU leads with 5.17% vs -26.61% for HFSP. On fees, JHMU is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, JHMU has been the lower-risk option at 0.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HFSP or JHMU?

Over the 1-year period, JHMU has performed better with a 5.17% return vs -26.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HFSP or JHMU?

JHMU is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 1.25% for HFSP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HFSP or JHMU?

JHMU has the higher dividend yield at 3.86%, compared with 0.00% for HFSP.

What is the main difference between HFSP and JHMU?

HFSP is categorized as Long-Short, while JHMU is Municipal Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Tidal and John Hancock. Their fees differ too: 1.25% for HFSP and 0.39% for JHMU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JHMU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs -1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.