HFSI vs. MINT
HFSI (Hartford Strategic Income ETF) and MINT (PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HFSI is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Hartford, while MINT is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by PIMCO. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, HFSI returned 8.28%/yr vs 5.40%/yr for MINT. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HFSI charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for MINT.
Performance
HFSI vs. MINT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HFSI achieves a 1.42% return, which is significantly lower than MINT's 1.94% return.
HFSI
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 1.12%
- YTD
- 1.42%
- 6M
- 1.84%
- 1Y
- 7.94%
- 3Y*
- 8.28%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MINT
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- 1.94%
- 6M
- 2.19%
- 1Y
- 4.67%
- 3Y*
- 5.40%
- 5Y*
- 3.49%
- 10Y*
- 2.72%
HFSI vs. MINT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HFSI Hartford Strategic Income ETF | 1.42% | 9.56% | 7.91% | 9.91% | -12.60% | -1.24% |
MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF | 1.94% | 4.74% | 5.94% | 6.26% | -1.01% | -0.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between HFSI and MINT is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2021 | 0.24 |
Over the past year, the correlation between HFSI and MINT has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.24, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HFSI vs. MINT — Risk / Return Rank
HFSI
MINT
HFSI vs. MINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Strategic Income ETF (HFSI) and PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HFSI | MINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -15.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -63.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 21.62 | -20.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.49 | 95.35 | -92.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.96 | 965.15 | -955.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HFSI vs. MINT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HFSI drawdown since its inception was -19.34%, which is greater than MINT's maximum drawdown of -4.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFSI and MINT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HFSI | MINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.34% | -4.62% | -14.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.06% | -0.05% | -3.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.11% | -0.16% | -4.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -2.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -4.62% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.16% | 0.00% | -0.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.69% | -0.17% | -5.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.76% | 0.00% | +0.76% |
Volatility
HFSI vs. MINT - Volatility Comparison
Hartford Strategic Income ETF (HFSI) has a higher volatility of 1.23% compared to PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT) at 0.09%. This indicates that HFSI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MINT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HFSI | MINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.23% | 0.09% | +1.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.59% | 0.20% | +2.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.56% | 0.27% | +3.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.96% | 0.58% | +4.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.96% | 0.95% | +4.01% |
HFSI vs. MINT - Expense Ratio Comparison
HFSI has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than MINT's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
HFSI vs. MINT - Dividend Comparison
HFSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.54%, more than MINT's 4.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HFSI Hartford Strategic Income ETF | 5.54% | 5.67% | 6.51% | 5.77% | 4.87% | 0.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF | 4.28% | 4.63% | 5.22% | 4.91% | 1.90% | 0.44% | 1.15% | 2.65% | 2.32% | 1.61% | 1.35% | 0.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HFSI and MINT have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HFSI has higher volatility (1.23%) compared to MINT (0.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HFSI dropped -19.34% vs MINT's -4.62%.
On 3-year performance, HFSI leads with 8.28% vs 5.40% for MINT. On fees, MINT is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, MINT has been the lower-risk option at 0.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, HFSI has performed better with a 8.28% return vs 5.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MINT is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for HFSI.
HFSI has the higher dividend yield at 5.54%, compared with 4.28% for MINT.
HFSI is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while MINT is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Hartford and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for HFSI and 0.36% for MINT.
MINT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (17.51 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HFSI and MINT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer