PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HFQAX vs. JACNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HFQAX vs. JACNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Global Equity Income Fund (HFQAX) and Janus Henderson Contrarian Fund (JACNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HFQAX achieves a 12.52% return, which is significantly lower than JACNX's 22.37% return. Over the past 10 years, HFQAX has underperformed JACNX with an annualized return of 8.45%, while JACNX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.21% annualized return.


HFQAX

1D
0.75%
1M
3.71%
YTD
12.52%
6M
14.83%
1Y
27.08%
3Y*
18.28%
5Y*
10.37%
10Y*
8.45%

JACNX

1D
2.08%
1M
9.51%
YTD
22.37%
6M
20.32%
1Y
35.36%
3Y*
19.90%
5Y*
9.06%
10Y*
14.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HFQAX vs. JACNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HFQAX
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income Fund
12.52%29.61%6.86%10.17%-6.59%12.45%1.66%20.87%-15.86%19.14%
JACNX
Janus Henderson Contrarian Fund
22.37%7.34%18.44%21.58%-21.54%20.79%27.88%43.19%-4.08%5.00%

Correlation

The correlation between HFQAX and JACNX is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2006

0.72

Over the past year, the correlation between HFQAX and JACNX has dropped to 0.51 - well below their long-term average of 0.71, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HFQAX vs. JACNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HFQAX
HFQAX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
HFQAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HFQAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
HFQAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
HFQAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
HFQAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

JACNX
JACNX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
JACNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JACNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
JACNX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
JACNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
JACNX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HFQAX vs. JACNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Global Equity Income Fund (HFQAX) and Janus Henderson Contrarian Fund (JACNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HFQAXJACNXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.36

1.87

+0.49

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.18

2.53

+0.64

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.31

+0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.67

2.61

+0.06

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.57

8.20

+1.37

HFQAX vs. JACNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HFQAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is comparable to the JACNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HFQAX and JACNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HFQAXJACNXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.36

1.87

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

0.41

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.65

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.38

-0.05

Drawdowns

HFQAX vs. JACNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HFQAX drawdown since its inception was -52.77%, smaller than the maximum JACNX drawdown of -66.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFQAX and JACNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HFQAXJACNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.77%

-66.81%

+14.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.99%

-14.27%

+4.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.20%

-23.92%

+11.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.83%

-30.32%

+8.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.79%

-40.25%

+5.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.29%

0.00%

-1.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.87%

-14.67%

+3.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.78%

4.53%

-1.75%

Volatility

HFQAX vs. JACNX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Janus Henderson Global Equity Income Fund (HFQAX) is 4.57%, while Janus Henderson Contrarian Fund (JACNX) has a volatility of 6.15%. This indicates that HFQAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JACNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HFQAXJACNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.57%

6.15%

-1.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.38%

15.75%

-6.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.34%

19.90%

-8.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.04%

22.05%

-9.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.75%

21.79%

-7.04%

HFQAX vs. JACNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HFQAX has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than JACNX's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

HFQAX vs. JACNX - Dividend Comparison

HFQAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.93%, less than JACNX's 9.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HFQAX
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income Fund
5.93%6.59%7.96%7.89%8.02%6.92%7.25%6.80%7.66%6.03%6.77%6.60%
JACNX
Janus Henderson Contrarian Fund
9.07%11.10%11.53%7.13%0.53%9.63%1.69%11.74%8.86%7.77%3.52%2.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


HFQAX and JACNX have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JACNX has higher volatility (6.15%) compared to HFQAX (4.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HFQAX dropped -52.77% vs JACNX's -66.81%.

HFQAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HFQAX and JACNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer