HFND vs. IALT
HFND (Unlimited HFND Multi-Strategy Return Tracker ETF) and IALT (iShares Systematic Alternatives Active ETF) are both Multistrategy funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HFND charges 1.22%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for IALT.
Performance
HFND vs. IALT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HFND achieves a 8.65% return, which is significantly lower than IALT's 13.14% return.
HFND
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- 2.07%
- YTD
- 8.65%
- 6M
- 8.06%
- 1Y
- 18.87%
- 3Y*
- 10.00%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IALT
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 2.25%
- YTD
- 13.14%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HFND vs. IALT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HFND Unlimited HFND Multi-Strategy Return Tracker ETF | 8.65% | -2.02% |
IALT iShares Systematic Alternatives Active ETF | 13.14% | 0.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between HFND and IALT is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025 | 0.58 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HFND vs. IALT — Risk / Return Rank
HFND
IALT
HFND vs. IALT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Unlimited HFND Multi-Strategy Return Tracker ETF (HFND) and iShares Systematic Alternatives Active ETF (IALT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HFND | IALT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.01 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.85 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.84 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.31 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HFND | IALT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.01 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.94 | 4.28 | -3.35 |
Drawdowns
HFND vs. IALT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HFND drawdown since its inception was -13.31%, which is greater than IALT's maximum drawdown of -1.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFND and IALT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HFND | IALT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.31% | -1.47% | -11.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.94% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.45% | -0.07% | -0.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.10% | -0.32% | -1.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.32% | — | — |
Volatility
HFND vs. IALT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HFND | IALT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.02% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.87% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.42% | 7.48% | +1.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.47% | 7.48% | +1.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.47% | 7.48% | +1.99% |
HFND vs. IALT - Expense Ratio Comparison
HFND has a 1.22% expense ratio, which is higher than IALT's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
HFND vs. IALT - Dividend Comparison
HFND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.68%, more than IALT's 0.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HFND Unlimited HFND Multi-Strategy Return Tracker ETF | 4.68% | 5.08% | 3.70% | 1.41% | 0.43% |
IALT iShares Systematic Alternatives Active ETF | 0.12% | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HFND and IALT have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IALT is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IALT is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.22% for HFND.
HFND has the higher dividend yield at 4.68%, compared with 0.12% for IALT.
They also come from different issuers: Tidal ETFs and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.22% for HFND and 0.99% for IALT.
Find the right allocation for HFND and IALT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer