PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HFMDX vs. HFCSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HFMDX vs. HFCSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hennessy Cornerstone Mid Cap 30 Fund (HFMDX) and Hennessy Focus Fund (HFCSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HFMDX achieves a 16.28% return, which is significantly higher than HFCSX's 10.07% return. Over the past 10 years, HFMDX has outperformed HFCSX with an annualized return of 14.19%, while HFCSX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.82% annualized return.


HFMDX

1D
-0.67%
1M
0.34%
YTD
16.28%
6M
16.34%
1Y
26.81%
3Y*
24.01%
5Y*
16.01%
10Y*
14.19%

HFCSX

1D
-2.83%
1M
12.52%
YTD
10.07%
6M
10.43%
1Y
41.58%
3Y*
22.61%
5Y*
10.22%
10Y*
11.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HFMDX vs. HFCSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HFMDX
Hennessy Cornerstone Mid Cap 30 Fund
16.28%2.68%34.13%30.83%2.72%27.23%23.37%15.76%-23.52%20.71%
HFCSX
Hennessy Focus Fund
10.07%28.30%14.67%20.99%-24.92%32.04%5.47%34.96%-10.93%19.27%

Correlation

The correlation between HFMDX and HFCSX is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2004

0.77

The correlation between HFMDX and HFCSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.77 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HFMDX vs. HFCSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HFMDX
HFMDX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
HFMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HFMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
HFMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
HFMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
HFMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

HFCSX
HFCSX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
HFCSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HFCSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
HFCSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
HFCSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
HFCSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HFMDX vs. HFCSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hennessy Cornerstone Mid Cap 30 Fund (HFMDX) and Hennessy Focus Fund (HFCSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HFMDXHFCSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.26

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.13

2.25

-0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.16

5.14

+2.03

HFMDX vs. HFCSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HFMDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is comparable to the HFCSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HFMDX and HFCSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HFMDXHFCSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.26

1.54

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

0.45

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.52

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.46

-0.01

Drawdowns

HFMDX vs. HFCSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HFMDX drawdown since its inception was -61.25%, roughly equal to the maximum HFCSX drawdown of -59.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFMDX and HFCSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HFMDXHFCSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.25%

-59.41%

-1.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.66%

-19.90%

+7.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.76%

-23.02%

-4.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.76%

-33.13%

+5.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.14%

-47.07%

-9.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.44%

-5.32%

+2.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.25%

-9.86%

-2.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.75%

8.70%

-4.95%

Volatility

HFMDX vs. HFCSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hennessy Cornerstone Mid Cap 30 Fund (HFMDX) is 6.22%, while Hennessy Focus Fund (HFCSX) has a volatility of 10.43%. This indicates that HFMDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HFCSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HFMDXHFCSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.22%

10.43%

-4.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.82%

20.92%

-5.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.46%

29.12%

-7.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.35%

22.88%

+0.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.09%

22.63%

+2.46%

HFMDX vs. HFCSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HFMDX has a 1.36% expense ratio, which is lower than HFCSX's 1.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

HFMDX vs. HFCSX - Dividend Comparison

HFMDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, less than HFCSX's 44.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HFCSX
Hennessy Focus Fund
44.02%48.46%15.94%24.51%15.15%17.19%35.80%10.78%22.20%0.01%0.00%0.20%
HFMDX
Hennessy Cornerstone Mid Cap 30 Fund
0.62%0.72%18.84%9.61%21.66%1.73%0.00%0.00%40.95%18.56%0.64%0.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


HFMDX and HFCSX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HFCSX has higher volatility (10.43%) compared to HFMDX (6.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HFMDX dropped -61.25% vs HFCSX's -59.41%.

HFCSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HFMDX and HFCSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer