HFGM vs. TACK
Compare and contrast key facts about Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF (HFGM) and Fairlead Tactical Sector Fund (TACK).
HFGM and TACK are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HFGM is an actively managed fund by Unlimited. It was launched on Apr 14, 2025. TACK is an actively managed fund by Fairlead. It was launched on Mar 22, 2022.
Performance
HFGM vs. TACK - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HFGM vs. TACK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HFGM Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF | 12.76% | 26.63% |
TACK Fairlead Tactical Sector Fund | 2.15% | 14.77% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HFGM achieves a 12.76% return, which is significantly higher than TACK's 2.15% return.
HFGM
- 1D
- 1.43%
- 1M
- -4.15%
- YTD
- 12.76%
- 6M
- 12.50%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TACK
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- -3.74%
- YTD
- 2.15%
- 6M
- 2.45%
- 1Y
- 13.43%
- 3Y*
- 9.40%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HFGM vs. TACK - Expense Ratio Comparison
HFGM has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than TACK's 0.76% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HFGM vs. TACK — Risk / Return Rank
HFGM
TACK
HFGM vs. TACK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF (HFGM) and Fairlead Tactical Sector Fund (TACK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HFGM | TACK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.02 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.96 | 0.57 | +1.39 |
Correlation
The correlation between HFGM and TACK is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
HFGM vs. TACK - Dividend Comparison
HFGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.96%, more than TACK's 1.24% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HFGM Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF | 9.96% | 11.23% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TACK Fairlead Tactical Sector Fund | 1.24% | 1.18% | 1.26% | 1.29% | 0.89% |
Drawdowns
HFGM vs. TACK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HFGM drawdown since its inception was -10.66%, smaller than the maximum TACK drawdown of -14.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFGM and TACK.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HFGM | TACK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.66% | -14.49% | +3.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.09% | -3.76% | -3.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.34% | -4.31% | +1.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.04% | — |
Volatility
HFGM vs. TACK - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HFGM | TACK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.06% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.48% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.05% | 13.21% | +9.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.05% | 11.33% | +11.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.05% | 11.33% | +11.72% |