HFGM vs. BRZU

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

HFGM (Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF) and BRZU (Direxion Daily Brazil Bull 2X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - HFGM is a Macro Trading fund actively managed by Unlimited, while BRZU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the MSCI Brazil 25/50 Index. HFGM is actively managed, while BRZU is passively managed. Over the past year, HFGM returned 32.45% vs 46.00% for BRZU. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HFGM charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.29%/yr for BRZU.

Performance

HFGM vs. BRZU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF (HFGM) and Direxion Daily Brazil Bull 2X Shares (BRZU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HFGM achieves a 10.23% return, which is significantly higher than BRZU's 5.84% return.

HFGM

• 1D: -0.25%
• 1M: -5.52%
• YTD: 10.23%
• 6M: 11.02%
• 1Y: 32.45%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BRZU

• 1D: -1.65%
• 1M: -26.61%
• YTD: 5.84%
• 6M: 6.23%
• 1Y: 46.00%
• 3Y*: 3.57%
• 5Y*: -4.83%
• 10Y*: -16.53%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HFGM vs. BRZU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HFGM Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF	10.23%	26.63%
BRZU Direxion Daily Brazil Bull 2X Shares	5.84%	68.57%

Correlation

The correlation between HFGM and BRZU is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.52
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2025	0.52

The correlation between HFGM and BRZU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

HFGM vs. BRZU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HFGM

HFGM Risk / Return Rank: 51
HFGM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
HFGM Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
HFGM Omega Ratio Rank: 45
HFGM Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
HFGM Martin Ratio Rank: 52

BRZU

BRZU Risk / Return Rank: 29
BRZU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
BRZU Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
BRZU Omega Ratio Rank: 30
BRZU Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
BRZU Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HFGM vs. BRZU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF (HFGM) and Direxion Daily Brazil Bull 2X Shares (BRZU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HFGM	BRZU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.43	0.93	+0.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.96	1.45	+0.51
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.18	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.06	1.28	+1.77
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.03	4.08	+3.94
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HFGM vs. BRZU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HFGM Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is higher than the BRZU Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HFGM and BRZU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HFGM	BRZU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.43	0.93	+0.50
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.09	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	-0.20	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.56	-0.35	+1.91

Drawdowns

HFGM vs. BRZU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HFGM drawdown since its inception was -10.66%, smaller than the maximum BRZU drawdown of -99.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFGM and BRZU.

Drawdown Indicators

	HFGM	BRZU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.66%	-99.71%	+89.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.66%	-35.97%	+25.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-58.25%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-65.00%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-98.11%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.17%	-99.24%	+90.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.74%	-89.56%	+86.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.05%	11.30%	-7.25%

Volatility

HFGM vs. BRZU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF (HFGM) is 5.01%, while Direxion Daily Brazil Bull 2X Shares (BRZU) has a volatility of 14.82%. This indicates that HFGM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BRZU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HFGM	BRZU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.01%	14.82%	-9.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.65%	41.71%	-24.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.82%	49.91%	-27.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.85%	55.42%	-33.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.85%	83.03%	-61.18%

HFGM vs. BRZU - Expense Ratio Comparison

HFGM has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than BRZU's 1.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

HFGM vs. BRZU - Dividend Comparison

HFGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.19%, more than BRZU's 2.52% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BRZU Direxion Daily Brazil Bull 2X Shares	2.52%	2.39%	8.73%	3.24%	4.70%	6.29%	0.78%	0.95%	1.04%	0.74%
HFGM Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF	10.19%	11.23%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HFGM and BRZU in my portfolio?

HFGM and BRZU have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HFGM or BRZU?

BRZU has higher volatility (14.82%) compared to HFGM (5.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HFGM dropped -10.66% vs BRZU's -99.71%.

Which ETF is better, HFGM or BRZU?

On 1-year performance, BRZU leads with 46.00% vs 32.45% for HFGM. On fees, HFGM is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, HFGM has been the lower-risk option at 5.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HFGM or BRZU?

Over the 1-year period, BRZU has performed better with a 46.00% return vs 32.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HFGM or BRZU?

HFGM is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for BRZU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HFGM or BRZU?

HFGM has the higher dividend yield at 10.19%, compared with 2.52% for BRZU.

What is the main difference between HFGM and BRZU?

HFGM is categorized as Macro Trading, while BRZU is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Unlimited and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for HFGM and 1.29% for BRZU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HFGM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.